On 04/20/2014 09:09 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I just glance wmbattery code. I find the code in the acpi.c is already
using the new sysfs battery interfaces, right?
By default, wmbattery appears to default to using upower as abstraction
level, instead of querying sysfs itself
On 04/20/2014 09:09 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I just glance wmbattery code. I find the code in the acpi.c is already
using the new sysfs battery interfaces, right?
By default, wmbattery appears to default to using upower as abstraction
level, instead of querying sysfs itself
Hi!
> >> I just glance wmbattery code. I find the code in the acpi.c is
> >> already
> >> using the new sysfs battery interfaces, right?
> >
> > By default, wmbattery appears to default to using upower as abstraction
> > level, instead of querying sysfs itself directly.
> >
> >
Hi!
I just glance wmbattery code. I find the code in the acpi.c is
already
using the new sysfs battery interfaces, right?
By default, wmbattery appears to default to using upower as abstraction
level, instead of querying sysfs itself directly.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Saturday 15 March 2014, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> On 03/14/2014 10:17 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > On Saturday 15 March 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann s@gmx.de wrote:
Hi
On Saturday 15 March 2014, Lan Tianyu wrote:
On 03/14/2014 10:17 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Saturday 15 March 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin
Hi!
> >New kernel should work with old userspace... and clearly it does not.
> >
> >Do you have test patch for a revert?
>
> Please try this patch.
I tried to apply it, but it is a bit too wordwrapped :-(.
Thanks,
Pavel
>
Hi!
New kernel should work with old userspace... and clearly it does not.
Do you have test patch for a revert?
Please try this patch.
I tried to apply it, but it is a bit too wordwrapped :-(.
Thanks,
Pavel
@@
Hi
On Saturday 15 March 2014, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> On 03/14/2014 10:17 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Saturday 15 March 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
On 03/15/2014 12:05 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
They have attempted to use the sysfs api, but apparently that
integration was done with an older version of that API. There's also
some attempt to get it to work with upower, but I couldn't figure out
how to make that work either on my
Hi!
> >>>They have attempted to use the sysfs api, but apparently that
> >>>integration was done with an older version of that API. There's also
> >>>some attempt to get it to work with upower, but I couldn't figure out
> >>>how to make that work either on my (up-to-date gentoo) box. (TBH I
>
On 03/14/2014 10:17 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Saturday 15 March 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at
On 03/14/2014 05:45 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
The interface
On Sat 2014-03-15 02:46:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >> > Hi!
>
On Sat 2014-03-15 02:46:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
On 03/14/2014 05:45 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
option to reintroduce it... what
On 03/14/2014 10:17 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Saturday 15 March 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar
Hi!
They have attempted to use the sysfs api, but apparently that
integration was done with an older version of that API. There's also
some attempt to get it to work with upower, but I couldn't figure out
how to make that work either on my (up-to-date gentoo) box. (TBH I
didn't spend more
On 03/15/2014 12:05 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
They have attempted to use the sysfs api, but apparently that
integration was done with an older version of that API. There's also
some attempt to get it to work with upower, but I couldn't figure out
how to make that work either on my
Hi
On Saturday 15 March 2014, Lan Tianyu wrote:
On 03/14/2014 10:17 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Saturday 15 March 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
On
Hi
On Saturday 15 March 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
[...]
> >
On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> > It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
>> > option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
> > option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
>
> The interface went away in a semi-recent kernel release
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
>> option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
>
> The interface went away in a semi-recent kernel release
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
> option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
The interface went away in a semi-recent kernel release (3.13 or
3.12), breaking pretty much every battery app.
Hi!
> It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
> option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
>
> (I got into habit of archiving content of /proc/acpi/battery to
> monitor, how battery ages..)
And this is ungood:
pavel@duo:~/denx/active$ cat
Hi!
It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
(I got into habit of archiving content of /proc/acpi/battery to
monitor, how battery ages..)
Pavel
--
Hi!
It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
(I got into habit of archiving content of /proc/acpi/battery to
monitor, how battery ages..)
Pavel
--
Hi!
It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
(I got into habit of archiving content of /proc/acpi/battery to
monitor, how battery ages..)
And this is ungood:
pavel@duo:~/denx/active$ cat
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
The interface went away in a semi-recent kernel release (3.13 or
3.12), breaking pretty much every battery
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
The interface went away in a
On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
option to reintroduce it... what is going on?
The interface went away in a semi-recent kernel release
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is gone, and I don't see any
option to reintroduce it... what is
On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
It seems /proc/acpi/battery interface is
Hi
On Saturday 15 March 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:14:12 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Fri 2014-03-14 17:29:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz
36 matches
Mail list logo
