On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 02:47:21PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > > > Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out
> > > > > that
> > > > > 3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be
> > > > > fun,
> >
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> The patch below seems to finally cure the problem at my system; I've just
> attached it to freedesktop bugzilla, but sending it to this thread as well
> to hopefully get as much testing coverage by affected people as possible.
>
> I am going on with
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out
> > > > that
> > > > 3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun,
> > > > anyway...
> > >
> > > I am still seeing the problem with 3.16-rc2.
> >
> >
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out
that
3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun,
anyway...
I am still seeing the problem with 3.16-rc2.
I'm confused now. Is the
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
The patch below seems to finally cure the problem at my system; I've just
attached it to freedesktop bugzilla, but sending it to this thread as well
to hopefully get as much testing coverage by affected people as possible.
I am going on with testing
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 02:47:21PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out
that
3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be
fun,
anyway...
I
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out
> > > > that
> > > > 3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun,
> > > > anyway...
> > >
> > > I am still seeing the problem with 3.16-rc2.
> >
> >
On Mon 2014-07-07 10:39:08, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:37:16PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out that
> > > 3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well,
On Mon 2014-07-07 10:39:08, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:37:16PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out that
3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out
that
3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun,
anyway...
I am still seeing the problem with 3.16-rc2.
I'm confused now. Is the
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:37:16PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out that
> > 3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun,
> > anyway...
>
> I am still seeing
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:37:16PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out that
3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun,
anyway...
I am still seeing the
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out that
> 3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun,
> anyway...
I am still seeing the problem with 3.16-rc2.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out that
3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun,
anyway...
I am still seeing the problem with 3.16-rc2.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from
On Mon 2014-06-09 13:03:31, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > > Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
> > > > cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
> > > > that it worked for a while.
> > >
> > >
On Mon 2014-06-09 13:03:31, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
that it worked for a while.
git bisect really
On Mon 2014-06-09 13:03:31, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > > Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
> > > > cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
> > > > that it worked for a while.
> > >
> > >
On Mon 2014-06-09 13:03:31, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
that it worked for a while.
git bisect really
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
> > > cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
> > > that it worked for a while.
> >
> > git bisect really likes 25f397a429dfa43f22c278d0119a60 -
On Mon 2014-06-09 11:25:20, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
> > cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
> > that it worked for a while.
>
> git
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
> cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
> that it worked for a while.
git bisect really likes 25f397a429dfa43f22c278d0119a60 - you're about
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
that it worked for a while.
git bisect really likes 25f397a429dfa43f22c278d0119a60 -
On Mon 2014-06-09 11:25:20, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
that it worked for a while.
git
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
Strange. It seems 3.15 with the patch reverted only boots in 30% or so
cases... And I've seen resume failure, too, so maybe I was just lucky
that it worked for a while.
git bisect really likes 25f397a429dfa43f22c278d0119a60 - you're about
On Sat 2014-06-07 14:06:14, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2014-05-15 17:31:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > >> > Note that X do work somehow after resume (I can't switch virtual
> > >> > desktops and dialog is stuck on screen, but it is not
On Thu 2014-05-15 17:31:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> >> > Note that X do work somehow after resume (I can't switch virtual
> >> > desktops and dialog is stuck on screen, but it is not complete
> >> > failure). I can do ctrl-alt-f1 and get to
On Thu 2014-05-15 17:31:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> >> > Note that X do work somehow after resume (I can't switch virtual
> >> > desktops and dialog is stuck on screen, but it is not complete
> >> > failure). I can do ctrl-alt-f1 and get to
On Thu 2014-05-15 17:31:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote:
Note that X do work somehow after resume (I can't switch virtual
desktops and dialog is stuck on screen, but it is not complete
failure). I can do ctrl-alt-f1 and get to
On Thu 2014-05-15 17:31:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote:
Note that X do work somehow after resume (I can't switch virtual
desktops and dialog is stuck on screen, but it is not complete
failure). I can do ctrl-alt-f1 and get to
On Sat 2014-06-07 14:06:14, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Thu 2014-05-15 17:31:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote:
Note that X do work somehow after resume (I can't switch virtual
desktops and dialog is stuck on screen, but it is not
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> > Note that X do work somehow after resume (I can't switch virtual
>> > desktops and dialog is stuck on screen, but it is not complete
>> > failure). I can do ctrl-alt-f1 and get to useful prompt.
>>
>> Oops. You were right. It seems it is
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote:
Note that X do work somehow after resume (I can't switch virtual
desktops and dialog is stuck on screen, but it is not complete
failure). I can do ctrl-alt-f1 and get to useful prompt.
Oops. You were right. It seems it is
On Wed 2014-05-14 18:10:22, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > So it might in the end of the day the same thing as I have reported in
> > >
> > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76554
> > >
> > > which is not 100% reproducible either (although
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > So it might in the end of the day the same thing as I have reported in
> >
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76554
> >
> > which is not 100% reproducible either (although with newer kernels it's
> > *much* more reproducible for
On Wed 2014-05-14 14:39:19, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > > There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
> > > > to disk.
> > > >
> > > > Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with "what
> > > > do you want to
On Tue, 13 May 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
> > > to disk.
> > >
> > > Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with "what
> > > do you want to do suspend/hibernate" dialog staying on screen.
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 13 May 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
to disk.
Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with what
do you want to do suspend/hibernate dialog staying on screen.
I did echo disk
On Wed 2014-05-14 14:39:19, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
to disk.
Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with what
do you want to do suspend/hibernate
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
So it might in the end of the day the same thing as I have reported in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76554
which is not 100% reproducible either (although with newer kernels it's
*much* more reproducible for me than with
On Wed 2014-05-14 18:10:22, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Pavel Machek wrote:
So it might in the end of the day the same thing as I have reported in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76554
which is not 100% reproducible either (although with newer
On Tue 2014-05-13 18:37:35, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
> > to disk.
> >
> > Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with "what
> > do you want to do suspend/hibernate" dialog staying on screen.
> >
> >
On Tue 2014-05-13 18:19:30, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Pavel Machek writes:
>
> > There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
> > to disk.
> >
> > Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with "what
> > do you want to do suspend/hibernate" dialog staying on
Hi!
> There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
> to disk.
>
> Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with "what
> do you want to do suspend/hibernate" dialog staying on screen.
>
> I did echo disk > /sys/power/state, and echo never returned to
Pavel Machek writes:
> There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
> to disk.
>
> Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with "what
> do you want to do suspend/hibernate" dialog staying on screen.
>
> I did echo disk > /sys/power/state, and echo
Hi!
There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
to disk.
Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with "what
do you want to do suspend/hibernate" dialog staying on screen.
I did echo disk > /sys/power/state, and echo never returned to the
shell
Hi!
There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
to disk.
Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with what
do you want to do suspend/hibernate dialog staying on screen.
I did echo disk /sys/power/state, and echo never returned to the
shell prompt.
Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz writes:
There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
to disk.
Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with what
do you want to do suspend/hibernate dialog staying on screen.
I did echo disk /sys/power/state, and echo
Hi!
There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
to disk.
Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with what
do you want to do suspend/hibernate dialog staying on screen.
I did echo disk /sys/power/state, and echo never returned to the
shell
On Tue 2014-05-13 18:19:30, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz writes:
There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
to disk.
Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with what
do you want to do suspend/hibernate dialog staying on
On Tue 2014-05-13 18:37:35, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
There seems to be regression in 3.15 w.r.t. suspend to ram and suspend
to disk.
Resume sometiems works, but often, system is half-usable, with what
do you want to do suspend/hibernate dialog staying on screen.
I did echo disk
50 matches
Mail list logo
