Re: 3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!

2013-02-03 Thread Christian Kujau
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 at 14:56, Christian Kujau wrote: > Hm, is there no chance to get this into 3.8? I've been running with this > patch applied since 3.7-rc7 and it got rid of this > "MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low" message. I've just upgraded to 3.8-rc5 > and it's still not in mainline :-\ Ha

Re: 3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!

2013-01-27 Thread Christian Kujau
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 at 14:59, Li Zhong wrote: > FYI, it is already in the next of ppc tree > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next > > I guess it would get into 3.9, at least. Hm, is there no chance to get this into 3.8? I've been running with t

Re: 3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!

2013-01-14 Thread Li Zhong
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 12:43 -0800, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 at 16:41, Li Zhong wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 19:22 -0800, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 at 19:06, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > > the same thing[0] happened again in 3.7-rc7, after ~20h uptime:

Re: 3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!

2013-01-12 Thread Christian Kujau
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 at 16:41, Li Zhong wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 19:22 -0800, Christian Kujau wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 at 19:06, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > the same thing[0] happened again in 3.7-rc7, after ~20h uptime: > > > > I found the following on patchwork, but this seems to dea

Re: 3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!

2012-12-02 Thread Li Zhong
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 12:32 -0800, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 at 16:41, Li Zhong wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 19:22 -0800, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 at 19:06, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > > the same thing[0] happened again in 3.7-rc7, after ~20h uptime:

Re: 3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!

2012-12-01 Thread Christian Kujau
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 at 16:41, Li Zhong wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 19:22 -0800, Christian Kujau wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 at 19:06, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > the same thing[0] happened again in 3.7-rc7, after ~20h uptime: > > > > I found the following on patchwork, but this seems to dea

Re: 3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!

2012-11-28 Thread Christian Kujau
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 at 16:41, Li Zhong wrote: > Would you please help to try the following fix? I don't have a powerpc32 > machine for test... I've just applied this to 3.7-rc7 and booted the machine. I don't know how to trigger this bug, so it might take a while until it happens again - or not,

Re: 3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!

2012-11-28 Thread Li Zhong
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 19:22 -0800, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 at 19:06, Christian Kujau wrote: > > the same thing[0] happened again in 3.7-rc7, after ~20h uptime: > > I found the following on patchwork, but this seems to deal with powerpc64 > only, while this PowerBook G4 of min

Re: 3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!

2012-11-27 Thread Christian Kujau
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 at 19:06, Christian Kujau wrote: > the same thing[0] happened again in 3.7-rc7, after ~20h uptime: I found the following on patchwork, but this seems to deal with powerpc64 only, while this PowerBook G4 of mine is powerpc32: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/193414/ It loo

3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!

2012-11-27 Thread Christian Kujau
Hi, the same thing[0] happened again in 3.7-rc7, after ~20h uptime: [40007.339487] [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated [69731.388717] BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low! [69731.390371] turning off the locking correctness validator. [69731.391942] Call Trace: [69731.393525] [c9a61c10]