On 07/04/2013 03:53 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On jeu., 2013-07-04 at 10:37 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> On jeu., 2013-07-04 at 07:53 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>> On 07/01/2013 03:07 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
Hopefully I will carve some time next weekend to play the restricted
b
On jeu., 2013-07-04 at 10:37 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On jeu., 2013-07-04 at 07:53 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > On 07/01/2013 03:07 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > > Hopefully I will carve some time next weekend to play the restricted
> > > bisect game.
> >
> > Release 3.10 apparently doesn
On jeu., 2013-07-04 at 07:53 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 03:07 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > Hopefully I will carve some time next weekend to play the restricted
> > bisect game.
>
> Release 3.10 apparently doesn't show the problem, I guess problem solved
> for me =)
>
> lu
>
I've j
On 07/01/2013 03:07 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Hopefully I will carve some time next weekend to play the restricted
> bisect game.
Release 3.10 apparently doesn't show the problem, I guess problem solved
for me =)
lu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
th
On 07/01/2013 08:25 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:22:32AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
>
>> MacBookPro8,2 with efi-stub, loading directly from the efi shell w/out
>> any memory restriction.
>
> How do you know this is the same issue?
>
I believe in duck bugs, if the rang
On 07/01/2013 01:25 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:22:32AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
>
>> MacBookPro8,2 with efi-stub, loading directly from the efi shell w/out
>> any memory restriction.
>
> How do you know this is the same issue?
>
Same behavior? Can't really know un
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:22:32AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> MacBookPro8,2 with efi-stub, loading directly from the efi shell w/out
> any memory restriction.
How do you know this is the same issue?
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On 07/01/2013 07:13 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:30:59PM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
>
>> mjg59, is there anything I can do to help move this bug forward? I've
>> done all I can think of (even tried a serial expresscard slot for logging).
>
> It does sound like a bug,
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:30:59PM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> mjg59, is there anything I can do to help move this bug forward? I've
> done all I can think of (even tried a serial expresscard slot for logging).
It does sound like a bug, but unfortunately unless it can be duplicated
on real ha
On 06/30/2013 11:41 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 06:30 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>
>> You had the problem where it was blank on boot (right after grub, no
>> kernel messages at all)? Sounds like this might not be limited to just
>> Lenovo then.
>
> no grub, efi-stub directly from the e
On 07/01/2013 06:30 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> You had the problem where it was blank on boot (right after grub, no
> kernel messages at all)? Sounds like this might not be limited to just
> Lenovo then.
no grub, efi-stub directly from the efi shell.
> mjg59, is there anything I can do to help
On 06/27/2013 01:17 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 06:47 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> There is an early boot failure with linux-3.[9,10].??? when booting
>> using uefi on low memory systems.
>>
>> This seems like it might be hardware specific, I am running on a Lenovo
>> T520, running bios
On 06/27/2013 06:47 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> There is an early boot failure with linux-3.[9,10].??? when booting
> using uefi on low memory systems.
>
> This seems like it might be hardware specific, I am running on a Lenovo
> T520, running bios version 1.42, firmware rev 1.36.
>
Had the same
On 06/27/2013 12:43 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:14PM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> On 06/27/2013 12:27 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:47:42AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
There is an early boot failure with linux-3.[9,10].??? when booti
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:14PM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 12:27 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:47:42AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> >> There is an early boot failure with linux-3.[9,10].??? when booting
> >> using uefi on low memory systems.
> >
> >
On 06/27/2013 12:27 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:47:42AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> There is an early boot failure with linux-3.[9,10].??? when booting
>> using uefi on low memory systems.
>
> Does it happen on systems that genuinely have small amounts of memory,
>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:47:42AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> There is an early boot failure with linux-3.[9,10].??? when booting
> using uefi on low memory systems.
Does it happen on systems that genuinely have small amounts of memory,
or only on systems where you're passing mem=?
--
Matthe
There is an early boot failure with linux-3.[9,10].??? when booting
using uefi on low memory systems.
This seems like it might be hardware specific, I am running on a Lenovo
T520, running bios version 1.42, firmware rev 1.36.
This seems to be limited to x86_64, as i386 does boot.
I build my init
18 matches
Mail list logo
