On 07/17/15 at 12:26pm, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:04:56AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > On 07/02/15 at 10:09pm, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > [ 33.425061] Running rhashtable test nelem=8, max_size=65536,
> > > shrinking=0
> > > [ 33.425154] Test 00:
> > > [ 33.534470] Addi
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:26:36PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:04:56AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > On 07/02/15 at 10:09pm, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > [ 33.425061] Running rhashtable test nelem=8, max_size=65536,
> > > shrinking=0
> > > [ 33.425154] Test 00:
> > > [
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:04:56AM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 07/02/15 at 10:09pm, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > [ 33.425061] Running rhashtable test nelem=8, max_size=65536, shrinking=0
> > [ 33.425154] Test 00:
> > [ 33.534470] Adding 5 keys
> > [ 34.743553] Info: encountered resize
>
On 07/02/15 at 10:09pm, Meelis Roos wrote:
> [ 33.425061] Running rhashtable test nelem=8, max_size=65536, shrinking=0
> [ 33.425154] Test 00:
> [ 33.534470] Adding 5 keys
> [ 34.743553] Info: encountered resize
> [ 34.743698] Info: encountered resize
> [ 34.743838] Info: encounte
> > [ 31.898697] Running resizable hashtable tests...
> > [ 31.898915] Adding 2048 keys
> > [ 31.952911] Traversal complete: counted=17, nelems=2048, entries=2048
> > [ 31.953004] Test failed: Total count mismatch ^^^
> > [ 32.022676] Traversal complete: counted=17, nelems=2048, ent
On 07/01/15 at 01:21pm, Meelis Roos wrote:
> This is 4.1 on sparc64 - one of my boxes that happens to have most
> runtime test left on from some debugging effort. In 4.0 it was fine, 4.1
> gives this in dmesg:
>
> [ 31.898697] Running resizable hashtable tests...
> [ 31.898915] Adding 2048
This is 4.1 on sparc64 - one of my boxes that happens to have most
runtime test left on from some debugging effort. In 4.0 it was fine, 4.1
gives this in dmesg:
[ 31.898697] Running resizable hashtable tests...
[ 31.898915] Adding 2048 keys
[ 31.952911] Traversal complete: counted=17,
7 matches
Mail list logo