On 19-10-16, 15:06, Tim Walberg wrote:
> This indeed turned out to be the fix.
Really? How can this fix the ondemand governor thing?
Or is it that Ondemand never broke ?
--
viresh
This indeed turned out to be the fix.
On 10/18/2016 23:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:46:06 PM Tim Walberg wrote:
>> > May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've
>> just observed
>> > on my system. Built a stock kernel f
On 18-10-16, 23:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:46:06 PM Tim Walberg wrote:
> > May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've just
> > observed
> > on my system. Built a stock kernel from tags/v4.8.1, relevant cpufreq bits:
> >
> > CONFIG_ACPI_CP
On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:46:06 PM Tim Walberg wrote:
> May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've just
> observed
> on my system. Built a stock kernel from tags/v4.8.1, relevant cpufreq bits:
>
> CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS=y
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_AT
May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've just observed
on my system. Built a stock kernel from tags/v4.8.1, relevant cpufreq bits:
CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ATTR_SET=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=y
CONFIG_CPU_FR
5 matches
Mail list logo