Re: 4.8.1 regression with cpufreq governors

2016-10-19 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 19-10-16, 15:06, Tim Walberg wrote: > This indeed turned out to be the fix. Really? How can this fix the ondemand governor thing? Or is it that Ondemand never broke ? -- viresh

Re: 4.8.1 regression with cpufreq governors

2016-10-19 Thread Tim Walberg
This indeed turned out to be the fix. On 10/18/2016 23:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:46:06 PM Tim Walberg wrote: >> > May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've >> just observed >> > on my system. Built a stock kernel f

Re: 4.8.1 regression with cpufreq governors

2016-10-19 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 18-10-16, 23:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:46:06 PM Tim Walberg wrote: > > May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've just > > observed > > on my system. Built a stock kernel from tags/v4.8.1, relevant cpufreq bits: > > > > CONFIG_ACPI_CP

Re: 4.8.1 regression with cpufreq governors

2016-10-18 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:46:06 PM Tim Walberg wrote: > May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've just > observed > on my system. Built a stock kernel from tags/v4.8.1, relevant cpufreq bits: > > CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS=y > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_AT

4.8.1 regression with cpufreq governors

2016-10-17 Thread Tim Walberg
May or may not be related to similar reports, but here's what I've just observed on my system. Built a stock kernel from tags/v4.8.1, relevant cpufreq bits: CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ATTR_SET=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=y CONFIG_CPU_FR