Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Neri, Ricardo wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 08:59 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis >> wrote: >> > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Neri, Ricardo wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 08:59 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis >> wrote: >> > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll >> > watch this thread for further updates

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 08:59 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > wrote: > > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 08:59 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > wrote: > > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress > > in my weekly reports.

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Sun, 30 Oct, at 08:59:58AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > wrote: > > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress > >

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Sun, 30 Oct, at 08:59:58AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis > wrote: > > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress > > in my weekly reports.

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressi...@leemhuis.info > in case the

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressi...@leemhuis.info in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another mail

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressi...@leemhuis.info in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another mail

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct, at 04:41:29PM, Matt Fleming wrote: >> >> FYI, I've been able to reproduce some crash when using your EFI memory >> map layout under Qemu and forcing the ESRT driver to reserve the space. > > Nope,

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct, at 04:41:29PM, Matt Fleming wrote: >> >> FYI, I've been able to reproduce some crash when using your EFI memory >> map layout under Qemu and forcing the ESRT driver to reserve the space. > > Nope, that was a bug in my hack. I

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Fri, 21 Oct, at 04:41:29PM, Matt Fleming wrote: > > FYI, I've been able to reproduce some crash when using your EFI memory > map layout under Qemu and forcing the ESRT driver to reserve the space. Nope, that was a bug in my hack. I can't get Qemu to crash while using your memory map layout.

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Fri, 21 Oct, at 04:41:29PM, Matt Fleming wrote: > > FYI, I've been able to reproduce some crash when using your EFI memory > map layout under Qemu and forcing the ESRT driver to reserve the space. Nope, that was a bug in my hack. I can't get Qemu to crash while using your memory map layout.

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Dan Williams wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Dan Williams >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Matt Fleming >> >

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Dan Williams wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Dan Williams >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Matt Fleming >> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, 19 Oct, at 09:04:29PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> I am

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Thu, 20 Oct, at 12:37:16PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > I am able to build a kernel and boot the platform with the following > set of reverts: > > Revert "x86/efi: Round EFI memmap reservations to EFI_PAGE_SIZE" > Revert "x86/efi-bgrt: Use efi_mem_reserve() to avoid copying image

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Thu, 20 Oct, at 12:37:16PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > I am able to build a kernel and boot the platform with the following > set of reverts: > > Revert "x86/efi: Round EFI memmap reservations to EFI_PAGE_SIZE" > Revert "x86/efi-bgrt: Use efi_mem_reserve() to avoid copying image

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

* Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Dan Williams > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Matt Fleming > > wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Oct, at 09:04:29PM, Dan Williams wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> >

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

* Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Dan Williams > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Matt Fleming > > wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Oct, at 09:04:29PM, Dan Williams wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 >

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Matt Fleming > wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Oct, at 09:04:29PM, Dan Williams wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline,

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Matt Fleming > wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Oct, at 09:04:29PM, Dan Williams wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 >>> boots. >>> >>> The symptom is a reboot

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct, at 09:04:29PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 boots. >> >> The symptom is a reboot before the video console is available. >> >>

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct, at 09:04:29PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 boots. >> >> The symptom is a reboot before the video console is available. >> >> I bisected to commit

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Wed, 19 Oct, at 09:04:29PM, Dan Williams wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 boots. > > The symptom is a reboot before the video console is available. > > I bisected to commit 816e76129ed5 "efi: Allow drivers to reserve boot > services

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

On Wed, 19 Oct, at 09:04:29PM, Dan Williams wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 boots. > > The symptom is a reboot before the video console is available. > > I bisected to commit 816e76129ed5 "efi: Allow drivers to reserve boot > services

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

* Dan Williams wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 boots. > > The symptom is a reboot before the video console is available. > > I bisected to commit 816e76129ed5 "efi: Allow drivers to reserve boot > services

Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

* Dan Williams wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 boots. > > The symptom is a reboot before the video console is available. > > I bisected to commit 816e76129ed5 "efi: Allow drivers to reserve boot > services forever". However, that

4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

Hi, I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 boots. The symptom is a reboot before the video console is available. I bisected to commit 816e76129ed5 "efi: Allow drivers to reserve boot services forever". However, that commit is known to be broken. The proposed

4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result

Hi, I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 boots. The symptom is a reboot before the video console is available. I bisected to commit 816e76129ed5 "efi: Allow drivers to reserve boot services forever". However, that commit is known to be broken. The proposed