On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> JE's UHCI driver (drivers/usb/uhci.[hc]) uses
> nested_lock() and nested_unlock() for this.
> Maybe it could help.
I may should solve the nested spinlock issue.. It however doesn't solve
the 100Kb+ pile of spaghetti the code is.
I think I'll just
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
JE's UHCI driver (drivers/usb/uhci.[hc]) uses
nested_lock() and nested_unlock() for this.
Maybe it could help.
I may should solve the nested spinlock issue.. It however doesn't solve
the 100Kb+ pile of spaghetti the code is.
I think I'll just start
iews of my employer.|
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 53c400 driver
>
>
&g
> 53c400a non-PNP still lock this system hard. It starts barking about a
> busy SCSI bus, and then I can fsck again.
>
> To Alan : How hard is it to get thing beast (53c400 and family) to be SMP
> safe ?? Or is it better to start over again ?
The problem is that the code takes spinlocks
Hi,
Support for some 53c400 cards is still bad (the non-PnP), so I'll start
fixing this.
I'll be my fist kernel job, so please spare me :))
Issues :
53c400a non-PNP still lock this system hard. It starts barking about a
busy SCSI bus, and then I can fsck again.
To Alan : How hard is it to
Hi,
Support for some 53c400 cards is still bad (the non-PnP), so I'll start
fixing this.
I'll be my fist kernel job, so please spare me :))
Issues :
53c400a non-PNP still lock this system hard. It starts barking about a
busy SCSI bus, and then I can fsck again.
To Alan : How hard is it to
53c400a non-PNP still lock this system hard. It starts barking about a
busy SCSI bus, and then I can fsck again.
To Alan : How hard is it to get thing beast (53c400 and family) to be SMP
safe ?? Or is it better to start over again ?
The problem is that the code takes spinlocks recursively.
of my employer.|
---
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 53c400 driver
53c400a non-PNP still lock this system hard
8 matches
Mail list logo