Problem is not fixed with your patch. Debugging packet is
http://patrec.com./rico/vger/diag002.tar.bz2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htm
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 02:44:03AM -0600, Rico Tudor wrote:
> > Hypthesis#2 The bounce buffer code in the Linus tree is known to be
> > imperfect. Does 2.4.2ac3 do the same ?
> >
> No improvement. (In fact, 2.4.2ac3 breaks 3ware IDE RAID support.)
The highmem changes in 2.4.2ac3 has a couple of
> No improvement. (In fact, 2.4.2ac3 breaks 3ware IDE RAID support.)
Curiouser and curiouser. The 3ware does have some known problems but you'd
see those equally on any SMP 1Ggig/4Gig/64Gig.
> While operating this Thunder 2500 (Tyan motherboard, ServerWorks chipset)
> is like walking on a minef
> Hypthesis#2 The bounce buffer code in the Linus tree is known to be
> imperfect. Does 2.4.2ac3 do the same ?
>
No improvement. (In fact, 2.4.2ac3 breaks 3ware IDE RAID support.)
While operating this Thunder 2500 (Tyan motherboard, ServerWorks chipset)
is like walking on a minefield, the probl
> Hypothesis:
> Code to handle PAE has buggy spinlock management.
Hypthesis#2 The bounce buffer code in the Linus tree is known to be
imperfect. Does 2.4.2ac3 do the same ?
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PR
Subject: 64GB option broken in 2.4.2
Problem:
The 64GB option causes processes to spin in the kernel.
Setup:
Linux 2.4.2
Slack current 20-feb-2001
ServerWorks III HE
4GB main memory
dual 933 Piii: SL47Q (stepping 3), SL4KK (stepping 6)
gcc
6 matches
Mail list logo
