Op 18-12-17 om 08:08 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> Hm, the bisect looks funny. Only way I can explain that is that my
> patch fixed a pre-existing lockdep splat, and uncovered the issue in
> the ww-mutex self tests. That one is uncovered by the new
> cross-release lockdep checks in 4.15.
>
> Anyway I
Op 18-12-17 om 08:08 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> Hm, the bisect looks funny. Only way I can explain that is that my
> patch fixed a pre-existing lockdep splat, and uncovered the issue in
> the ww-mutex self tests. That one is uncovered by the new
> cross-release lockdep checks in 4.15.
>
> Anyway I
Hm, the bisect looks funny. Only way I can explain that is that my
patch fixed a pre-existing lockdep splat, and uncovered the issue in
the ww-mutex self tests. That one is uncovered by the new
cross-release lockdep checks in 4.15.
Anyway I think this is an issue with the ww-mutex tests, not my
Hm, the bisect looks funny. Only way I can explain that is that my
patch fixed a pre-existing lockdep splat, and uncovered the issue in
the ww-mutex self tests. That one is uncovered by the new
cross-release lockdep checks in 4.15.
Anyway I think this is an issue with the ww-mutex tests, not my
4 matches
Mail list logo
