Thanks for your report.
A git-bisect might be a bit of overkill considering that there were only
two patches applied beween 2.6.16.4 and 2.6.16.5:
Andi Kleen (2):
x86_64: Clean up execve
x86_64: When user could have changed RIP always force IRET (CVE-2006-0744)
I've attached both p
On 11/29/06, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:18:18AM -0800, Zhao Forrest wrote:
> On 11/28/06, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I first need to contact the author of test case if we could send the
> >> test case to open source. The test case is call
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:18:18AM -0800, Zhao Forrest wrote:
> On 11/28/06, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I first need to contact the author of test case if we could send the
> >> test case to open source. The test case is called "crashme",
> >
> >Is that the classical crashme as
On 11/28/06, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I first need to contact the author of test case if we could send the
> test case to open source. The test case is called "crashme",
Is that the classical crashme as found in LTP or an enhanced one?
Do you run it in a special way? Is the crash
4 matches
Mail list logo
