Re: ACPI-APEI-HEST: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

2016-09-06 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> Well, as I said elsewhere, if you make the same type of change in > multiple places in one piece of code (or code maintained by the same > maintainer), I can imagine that my update suggestions will also trigger some additional development efforts. I assume that some contributors appreciate fine

Re: ACPI-APEI-HEST: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

2016-09-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:38 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> Like in the other patch series I've just commented, > > Thanks for your quick response. > > >> please put all label renames into one patch. > > Could you accept these update suggestions generally? > > > I would prefer to avoid squashing s

Re: ACPI-APEI-HEST: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

2016-09-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> Like in the other patch series I've just commented, Thanks for your quick response. > please put all label renames into one patch. Could you accept these update suggestions generally? I would prefer to avoid squashing special changes together by default. Regards, Markus

Re: [PATCH 0/7] ACPI-APEI-HEST: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

2016-09-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:12 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 22:05:05 +0200 > > Some update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (7): > Fix a typo in a comment line > Use kmalloc_array() in hest_

[PATCH 0/7] ACPI-APEI-HEST: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

2016-09-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 22:05:05 +0200 Some update suggestions were taken into account from static source code analysis. Markus Elfring (7): Fix a typo in a comment line Use kmalloc_array() in hest_ghes_dev_register() Move an assignment in hest_ghes_dev_register() Rena