Re: ACPI broken in 2.4.1

2001-02-04 Thread Alan Cox
> I waited out the boot so I could login and experiment, but it was > painfully slow. > > Compiling with just APM in and no ACPI, results in a correctly-running > machine with rh7 gcc-2.96-69. Lots of people are seeing this. Stick to APM for now until the acpi folks fix it. - To unsubscribe

Re: ACPI broken in 2.4.1

2001-02-04 Thread Benson Chow
Hoyle wrote: > Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 15:26:04 + > From: Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ACPI broken in 2.4.1 > > In my wifes' machine 2.4.1 (both vanilla and -ac2) enabling ACPI causes > the machine to run so slowly it's unusable. On

ACPI broken in 2.4.1

2001-02-04 Thread Tony Hoyle
In my wifes' machine 2.4.1 (both vanilla and -ac2) enabling ACPI causes the machine to run so slowly it's unusable. On my machine it's OK. 2.4.0 worked fine, so something has changed between 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 that broke it. I couldn't find anything in dmesg that looked any different, though.

Re: ACPI broken in 2.4.1

2001-02-04 Thread Benson Chow
Hoyle wrote: Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 15:26:04 + From: Tony Hoyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACPI broken in 2.4.1 In my wifes' machine 2.4.1 (both vanilla and -ac2) enabling ACPI causes the machine to run so slowly it's unusable. On my machine it's OK. 2.4.0 worked

Re: ACPI broken in 2.4.1

2001-02-04 Thread Alan Cox
I waited out the boot so I could login and experiment, but it was painfully slow. Compiling with just APM in and no ACPI, results in a correctly-running machine with rh7 gcc-2.96-69. Lots of people are seeing this. Stick to APM for now until the acpi folks fix it. - To unsubscribe from