RE: [ACPI] RE: ACPI oddity

2005-07-26 Thread Moore, Robert
day, July 25, 2005 10:02 PM > To: Bill Davidsen; Linux Kernel Mailing List > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ACPI] RE: ACPI oddity > > >On a HT system, why does ACPI recognize CPU0 and CPU1, refer > >to them as such in dmesg > > This is the Linux CPU number. ie the nam

Re: ACPI oddity

2005-07-26 Thread Bill Davidsen
Brown, Len wrote: On a HT system, why does ACPI recognize CPU0 and CPU1, refer to them as such in dmesg This is the Linux CPU number. ie the namespace where 0 is the boot processor and the others are numbered in the order that they were started. and then call them CPU1 and CPU2 in /proc/acp

RE: ACPI oddity

2005-07-25 Thread Brown, Len
>On a HT system, why does ACPI recognize CPU0 and CPU1, refer >to them as such in dmesg This is the Linux CPU number. ie the namespace where 0 is the boot processor and the others are numbered in the order that they were started. > and then call them CPU1 and CPU2 in >/proc/acpi/processor? The

ACPI oddity

2005-07-25 Thread Bill Davidsen
On a HT system, why does ACPI recognize CPU0 and CPU1, refer to them as such in dmesg, and then call them CPU1 and CPU2 in /proc/acpi/processor? In uni kernels the single processor is CPU0. This is a 2.6.10 kernel, the machine has been up since then. I have other 2.6 machines and other SMP and