On 28-Jun-2001 Tim Moore wrote:
>> (I wrote)
>> Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot
>> when using PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly.
>>
>> Disabling MMX optimizations in this software would "solve" the
>> problem. Another solution found on the web
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of
>the problem. It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
>
> I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd,
>Sound
> Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot when using
> PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly.
>
> Disabling MMX optimizations in this software would "solve" the problem. Another
> solution found on the web (sorry, I don't have the URL at hand) is to add two
Le 26-Jun-2001, Alex Deucher écrivait :
> What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
> athlon optimizations.
Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot when using
PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly.
Disabling MMX optimizations in
Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot when using
PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly.
Disabling MMX optimizations in this software would solve the problem. Another
solution found on the web (sorry, I don't have the URL at hand) is to add two
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of
the problem. It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd,
Sound card,
Le 26-Jun-2001, Alex Deucher écrivait :
What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
athlon optimizations.
Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot when using
PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly.
Disabling MMX optimizations in
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of
>the problem. It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
I would have bet that power supply was erogating elettricity with a
Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of
the problem. It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd,
Sound card, video, modem, NIC, scsi card)
Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of
the problem. It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd,
Sound card, video, modem, NIC, scsi card)
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of
the problem. It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
I would have bet that power supply was erogating elettricity with a
discontinous
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
> actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
> some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
> optimisation if you
> What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
> athlon optimizations. I'm not sure how much of a speed improvement they
That fits the pattern beautifully.
> provide, but everything's fine with i686, so I can't complain, besides I
> doubt I can return the board at this
What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
athlon optimizations. I'm not sure how much of a speed improvement they
provide, but everything's fine with i686, so I can't complain, besides I
doubt I can return the board at this point anyway. BTW, which would be
better with
> I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
> 7.1, athlon 850 system. runs rock solid when I compile for i686. I
> assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
> athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
> while
I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
7.1, athlon 850 system. runs rock solid when I compile for i686. I
assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
while back on the
> With 2.2.x Kernel my System runs stable, but when i'm using whatever 2.4.x kernel i
>like,
> i get the oopses and processcrashes (but only when i'm NOT root!)
That bit is fascinating. Do you do different things as non root ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hi,
> I went trought 8 Athlon, (latest 1300 Mhz 200Mhz FSB).
> Usually those stability problems are related to power supply (it should
> be at less 300 Watt).
> If the power supply does not give enought Ampere, and the energy
> is fluttuant, the Athlon cpu really suffers.
I have a 400 Watt
I went trought 8 Athlon, (latest 1300 Mhz 200Mhz FSB).
Usually those stability problems are related to power supply (it should
be at less 300 Watt).
If the power supply does not give enought Ampere, and the energy
is fluttuant, the Athlon cpu really suffers.
I usually do a little overvolt of
Hi,
> as i've said before - i have the same problem too
Me too
> the memory is OK! - have run memtest86 for hours ... - no errors ... -
> heatsink - CPU@45°C - Case @ 25°C
> after changing the kernel compile to PentiumII (nearly) everything worked
> fine
I HAD a Asus K7M with a 650 MHz
2.4.5ac16 doesn't work at all - random oopses ..
ThomasK.
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: AMD thunderbird oops
> > I just upgradede
Hi,
as i've said before - i have the same problem too
Me too
the memory is OK! - have run memtest86 for hours ... - no errors ... -
heatsink - CPU@45°C - Case @ 25°C
after changing the kernel compile to PentiumII (nearly) everything worked
fine
I HAD a Asus K7M with a 650 MHz
I went trought 8 Athlon, (latest 1300 Mhz 200Mhz FSB).
Usually those stability problems are related to power supply (it should
be at less 300 Watt).
If the power supply does not give enought Ampere, and the energy
is fluttuant, the Athlon cpu really suffers.
I usually do a little overvolt of
Hi,
I went trought 8 Athlon, (latest 1300 Mhz 200Mhz FSB).
Usually those stability problems are related to power supply (it should
be at less 300 Watt).
If the power supply does not give enought Ampere, and the energy
is fluttuant, the Athlon cpu really suffers.
I have a 400 Watt power
With 2.2.x Kernel my System runs stable, but when i'm using whatever 2.4.x kernel i
like,
i get the oopses and processcrashes (but only when i'm NOT root!)
That bit is fascinating. Do you do different things as non root ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
7.1, athlon 850 system. runs rock solid when I compile for i686. I
assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
while back on the
2.4.5ac16 doesn't work at all - random oopses ..
ThomasK.
- Original Message -
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: AMD thunderbird oops
I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird
What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
athlon optimizations. I'm not sure how much of a speed improvement they
That fits the pattern beautifully.
provide, but everything's fine with i686, so I can't complain, besides I
doubt I can return the board at this
What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
athlon optimizations. I'm not sure how much of a speed improvement they
provide, but everything's fine with i686, so I can't complain, besides I
doubt I can return the board at this point anyway. BTW, which would be
better with
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
optimisation if you set
I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
7.1, athlon 850 system. runs rock solid when I compile for i686. I
assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
while back on
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may
> even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
> the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a faulty
> component somewhere if
Have you considered to change your dimm at all?
If they are bugged they should be under warranty.
Luigi
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks,
> I have a heat sink and it is huge about 2 inches, plus fan. Plus another 4" fan
>in the case. (real nice case).
>
> I
Thanks,
I have a heat sink and it is huge about 2 inches, plus fan. Plus another 4" fan in
the case. (real nice case).
I think it is the memory, as yesterday my gcc was bombing with 'internel compiler
error', which is usually a good mem tester. So I started setting mem=64m and
Works well for me, Athlon 1300 (200Mhz FSB).
Did you check your ram?
Luigi
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB)
>processor / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
>
> It is oppsing left and right.
rom: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: AMD thunderbird oops
> > I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz
FSB) processor / 512Meg
> I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB)
>processor / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
>
> It is oppsing left and right. I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but
>keep getting these oopses..
>
> I also get these same problems
: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: AMD thunderbird oops
I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz
FSB) processor / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
It is oppsing
Works well for me, Athlon 1300 (200Mhz FSB).
Did you check your ram?
Luigi
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB)
processor / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
It is oppsing left and right. I
Have you considered to change your dimm at all?
If they are bugged they should be under warranty.
Luigi
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks,
I have a heat sink and it is huge about 2 inches, plus fan. Plus another 4 fan
in the case. (real nice case).
I think it
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may
even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a faulty
component somewhere if its
I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB)
processor / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
It is oppsing left and right. I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but
keep getting these oopses..
I also get these same problems while
Thanks,
I have a heat sink and it is huge about 2 inches, plus fan. Plus another 4 fan in
the case. (real nice case).
I think it is the memory, as yesterday my gcc was bombing with 'internel compiler
error', which is usually a good mem tester. So I started setting mem=64m and things
I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB) processor
/ 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
It is oppsing left and right. I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but
keep getting these oopses..
I also get these same problems while trying
I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB) processor
/ 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
It is oppsing left and right. I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but
keep getting these oopses..
I also get these same problems while trying
45 matches
Mail list logo
