On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Simon Baatz wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:51:15PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> diff --git a/lib/scatterlist.c b/lib/scatterlist.c
>> index a685c8a..eea8806 100644
>> --- a/lib/scatterlist.c
>> +++ b/lib/scatterlist.c
>> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ void
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:51:15PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/scatterlist.c b/lib/scatterlist.c
> index a685c8a..eea8806 100644
> --- a/lib/scatterlist.c
> +++ b/lib/scatterlist.c
> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ void sg_miter_stop(struct sg_mapping_iter *miter)
> miter->__offset
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 02:18:17PM +, Simon Baatz wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 01:53:44PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > So...
> >
> >
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 02:18:17PM +, Simon Baatz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 01:53:44PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi
wrote:
So...
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:51:15PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
diff --git a/lib/scatterlist.c b/lib/scatterlist.c
index a685c8a..eea8806 100644
--- a/lib/scatterlist.c
+++ b/lib/scatterlist.c
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ void sg_miter_stop(struct sg_mapping_iter *miter)
miter-__offset +=
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Simon Baatz gmbno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:51:15PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
diff --git a/lib/scatterlist.c b/lib/scatterlist.c
index a685c8a..eea8806 100644
--- a/lib/scatterlist.c
+++ b/lib/scatterlist.c
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ void
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>> >
>> > On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
>> > started to appear with the
Hi Russell,
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 01:53:44PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > >
> So...
>
> flush_kernel_dcache_page() is expected to take a struct page pointer.
>
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> >
> > On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
> > started to appear with the following commit (bisected):
> >
> > commit
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:42:57AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > >
> > > On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
> > > started to appear with the
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> >
> > On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
> > started to appear with the following commit (bisected):
> >
> > commit
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>
> On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
> started to appear with the following commit (bisected):
>
> commit 1bc39742aab09248169ef9d3727c9def3528b3f3
> Author: Simon Baatz
> Date: Mon Jun 10 21:10:12 2013
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:51:15PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:36:17 +0100
> Will Deacon wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> >
> > > [ 36.477203] Backtrace:
> > > [ 36.535603] [] (page_mapping+0x0/0x50) from []
> > >
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:36:17 +0100
Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>
> > [ 36.477203] Backtrace:
> > [ 36.535603] [] (page_mapping+0x0/0x50) from []
> > (flush_kernel_dcache_page+0x14/0x98)
> > [ 36.661070] []
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:36:17 +0100
Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
[ 36.477203] Backtrace:
[ 36.535603] [c009237c] (page_mapping+0x0/0x50) from [c0010dd8]
(flush_kernel_dcache_page+0x14/0x98)
[ 36.661070]
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:51:15PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:36:17 +0100
Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
[ 36.477203] Backtrace:
[ 36.535603] [c009237c] (page_mapping+0x0/0x50) from
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote:
On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
started to appear with the following commit (bisected):
commit 1bc39742aab09248169ef9d3727c9def3528b3f3
Author: Simon Baatz gmbno...@gmail.com
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote:
On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
started to appear with the following commit (bisected):
commit
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:42:57AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote:
On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
started to appear with
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote:
On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
started to appear with the following commit (bisected):
commit
Hi Russell,
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 01:53:44PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote:
So...
flush_kernel_dcache_page() is expected to take a struct page
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote:
On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 03:36:17PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > [ 26.694345] ata2: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
> > [ 31.194346] ata2: SRST failed (errno=-16)
> > [ 31.754426] ata2: SATA link up
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
[adding Catalin and Simon]
> I was trying to debug kernel crashes on Marvell Kirkwood (openrd)
> when upgrading from GCC 4.7.3 -> GCC 4.8.2. So I enabled most of the
> kernel debug options. However, I noticed that
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
[adding Catalin and Simon]
I was trying to debug kernel crashes on Marvell Kirkwood (openrd)
when upgrading from GCC 4.7.3 - GCC 4.8.2. So I enabled most of the
kernel debug options. However, I noticed that already
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 03:36:17PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
[ 26.694345] ata2: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
[ 31.194346] ata2: SRST failed (errno=-16)
[ 31.754426] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps
26 matches
Mail list logo
