Re: ARP routing issue - semi-solved

2005-01-24 Thread Jan De Luyck
Hello lists, Just for the archive records: we solved it this way (with the good help of IBM): # ip route add 10.0.24.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.24.xxx table 1 # ip route add default via 10.0.24.1 dev eth1 table 1 # ip rule add from 10.0.24.xxx/32 table 1 priority 500 # ip ro

Re: ARP routing issue

2005-01-15 Thread Alan Cox
On Sad, 2005-01-15 at 12:31, Jan De Luyck wrote: > On Friday 14 January 2005 23:47, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > > That arp is perfectly OK. > > The routing table will cause the icmp echo packet to go from 10.216.0.xx > > to 10.0.24.xx via the 10.0.24.x network. > > The icmp echo response will re

Re: ARP routing issue

2005-01-15 Thread Jan De Luyck
On Friday 14 January 2005 23:47, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > That arp is perfectly OK. > The routing table will cause the icmp echo packet to go from 10.216.0.xx > to 10.0.24.xx via the 10.0.24.x network. > The icmp echo response will return via the 10.0.22.x network back to the > 10.216.0.xx ne