Re: ATA ACPI needs "Mr interpreter, would you please shut up?" flag

2007-12-14 Thread Mark Lord
Tejun Heo wrote: I take it back. I found how to satisfy neurotic BIOSen. .. Aaaa.. excellent! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please re

Re: ATA ACPI needs "Mr interpreter, would you please shut up?" flag

2007-12-14 Thread Tejun Heo
I take it back. I found how to satisfy neurotic BIOSen. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www

Re: ATA ACPI needs "Mr interpreter, would you please shut up?" flag

2007-12-13 Thread Tejun Heo
Robert Hancock wrote: >> Problem is that _GTM implementation on certain BIOSen crap themselves if >> invoked on empty channels. However, as written above, because initial >> _GTM caching is done before any actual operation is performed on the >> port, libata can't determine whether the port is occ

Re: ATA ACPI needs "Mr interpreter, would you please shut up?" flag

2007-12-13 Thread Robert Hancock
Tejun Heo wrote: Hello, all. During 2.6.24-rc1, libata enabled ATA-ACPI support by default and there have been a lot of regression reports stemming from it. I have patchset ready to fix most of the problems. With these patches applied, libata should be able to cope with most failures pretty we

ATA ACPI needs "Mr interpreter, would you please shut up?" flag

2007-12-13 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, all. During 2.6.24-rc1, libata enabled ATA-ACPI support by default and there have been a lot of regression reports stemming from it. I have patchset ready to fix most of the problems. With these patches applied, libata should be able to cope with most failures pretty well. There is one r