hi,
On 09/09/2014 05:26 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 07:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> @hpa: You asked whether this might affect any other e6xx devices.
>>
>> According to the atom e6xx-series datasheet the HPET is non optional
>> and always memory mapped to 0xfed0. I don't s
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 07:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > @hpa: You asked whether this might affect any other e6xx devices.
> >
> > According to the atom e6xx-series datasheet the HPET is non optional
> > and always memory mapped to 0xfed0. I don't se
On 09/09/2014 07:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> @hpa: You asked whether this might affect any other e6xx devices.
>
> According to the atom e6xx-series datasheet the HPET is non optional
> and always memory mapped to 0xfed0. I don't see how that would
> harm any machine which has the hpet
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> On 02/14/2014 07:28 PM, Conrad Kostecki wrote:
> This patch enables a quirk for the Soekris net6501 HPET if
> pciquirks=soekris_e6xx" is supplied at the kernel commandline,
> Without these patches the clocksource defaults to jiffies, which
> is unstable.
Hello Conrad,
On 02/14/2014 07:28 PM, Conrad Kostecki wrote:
>> On 02/14/2014 10:13 AM, Conrad Kostecki wrote:
Does it have DMI?
>>>
>>> Unfortunately not.
>>>
>>> # dmidecode 2.12
>>> # No SMBIOS nor DMI entry point found, sorry.
>>>
>>
>> Sigh. Does anyone have contacts at Soekris who
> On 02/14/2014 10:13 AM, Conrad Kostecki wrote:
> >>
> >> Does it have DMI?
> >
> > Unfortunately not.
> >
> > # dmidecode 2.12
> > # No SMBIOS nor DMI entry point found, sorry.
> >
>
> Sigh. Does anyone have contacts at Soekris who can complain about this
> stuff?
I don't think, that Soekris w
6 matches
Mail list logo
