Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S

2001-05-14 Thread Juan Pablo Abuyeres
Before merging both hard disks I saw each of them as a separate SCSI device, at boot time and when the system booted up. After building the RAID1, when the system boots I only see one RAID device recognized, and so do I when linux recognizes it. [root@lala log]# cat /proc/scsi/dpt_i2o/0 Vendor: D

Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S

2001-05-14 Thread Josh Logan
What makes you think /dev/sda is the raid? For me cat /proc/scsi/scsi lists all 4 drives which, to me, implies that it is raw. fdisk could not partition the raid by default. I needed to use sfdisk the first time. After that fdisk worked fine. If I have both modules loaded I can mount /dev/i2

Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S

2001-05-14 Thread Juan Pablo Abuyeres
> > Then When I tried to fdisk /dev/sda (/dev/sda is a RAID1 of two > > Quantum disks) syslog shows this: > > is /dev/sda the raid or the disks raw ? /dev/sda is the RAID1 > > So, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or what, but I haven't been > > able to get it working on 2.4.4 yet... ple

Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S

2001-05-14 Thread Alan Cox
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: PARAMS_GET - Error: > May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: ErrorInfoSize = 0x01, BlockStatus = 0x08, > BlockSize = 0x0002 > May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: PARAMS_GET - Error: > May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: ErrorInfoSize = 0x01, BlockStatus = 0x08, > BlockSize = 0x0002 Thi

Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S

2001-05-14 Thread Juan Pablo Abuyeres
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > well, I applied 2.4.4ac8 (I couldn't find ac9) and I still have only > > errors when recognizing the hardware. The long waiting is gone. I will try > > to send the messages somehow. They were not saved on log files because it > > couldn't mount the devices

Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S

2001-05-14 Thread Giulio Orsero
linux.adaptec.com is where they put linux stuff. Ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the latest 2.4.x kernel patch/driver for dpt i2o controllers. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kern

Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S

2001-05-14 Thread Alan Cox
> well, I applied 2.4.4ac8 (I couldn't find ac9) and I still have only > errors when recognizing the hardware. The long waiting is gone. I will try > to send the messages somehow. They were not saved on log files because it > couldn't mount the devices (and I don't have a spare disk to do the tric

Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S

2001-05-14 Thread Juan Pablo Abuyeres
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I'm trying to make this card work under 2.4.4, but I couldn't find a patch > > anywhere to get it working under 2.4.x nor on 2.2.x. I tried with the I2O > > kernel support, but it didn't work, it only reported errors after a pretty > > long waiting :) > >

Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S

2001-05-13 Thread Alan Cox
> I'm trying to make this card work under 2.4.4, but I couldn't find a patch > anywhere to get it working under 2.4.x nor on 2.2.x. I tried with the I2O > kernel support, but it didn't work, it only reported errors after a pretty > long waiting :) You need to 2.4.4ac8 or higher for dpt i2o_scsi a

Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S

2001-05-13 Thread Juan Pablo Abuyeres
hi, I'm trying to make this card work under 2.4.4, but I couldn't find a patch anywhere to get it working under 2.4.x nor on 2.2.x. I tried with the I2O kernel support, but it didn't work, it only reported errors after a pretty long waiting :) The CDROM the card comes with brings a precompiled m