* Jan Engelhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> And when is this becoming business? What made post_setUid go into the kernel?
That went as part of supporting capabilities as they were, to do fixups
on set{r,e,s}uid.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
>So keep the patch part of your module, it has no business in mainline
>so far.
And when is this becoming business? What made post_setUid go into the kernel?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 09:54:40AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> >> the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary
> >> dummy
> >> funcs.
> >
> >... and why exactly would we want these?
>
> I am working on a sec module which, among other things, raises certain
>
>> the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary dummy
>> funcs.
>
>... and why exactly would we want these?
I am working on a sec module which, among other things, raises certain
capabilities when the UID/GID has been successfully changed.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To
the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary dummy
funcs.
... and why exactly would we want these?
I am working on a sec module which, among other things, raises certain
capabilities when the UID/GID has been successfully changed.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 09:54:40AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary
dummy
funcs.
... and why exactly would we want these?
I am working on a sec module which, among other things, raises certain
capabilities when the
So keep the patch part of your module, it has no business in mainline
so far.
And when is this becoming business? What made post_setUid go into the kernel?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
* Jan Engelhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
And when is this becoming business? What made post_setUid go into the kernel?
That went as part of supporting capabilities as they were, to do fixups
on set{r,e,s}uid.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
* Jan Engelhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary dummy
> funcs.
why?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:42:46PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary dummy
> funcs.
... and why exactly would we want these?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Hi,
the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary dummy
funcs.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -dpru linux-2.6.13-rc1-git3-20050706140055/include/linux/security.h
AS17/include/linux/security.h
---
Hi,
the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary dummy
funcs.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -dpru linux-2.6.13-rc1-git3-20050706140055/include/linux/security.h
AS17/include/linux/security.h
---
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:42:46PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Hi,
the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary dummy
funcs.
... and why exactly would we want these?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
* Jan Engelhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the following patch adds a post_setgid() security hook, and necessary dummy
funcs.
why?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
14 matches
Mail list logo
