On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:49:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 23:13 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > It's useful sometimes to disable the softlockup checker at boottime.
> > Especially if it triggers during a distro install.
>
> Should we not rather fix these
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 23:13 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> It's useful sometimes to disable the softlockup checker at boottime.
> Especially if it triggers during a distro install.
Should we not rather fix these occurrences?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 23:13 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
It's useful sometimes to disable the softlockup checker at boottime.
Especially if it triggers during a distro install.
Should we not rather fix these occurrences?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:49:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 23:13 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
It's useful sometimes to disable the softlockup checker at boottime.
Especially if it triggers during a distro install.
Should we not rather fix these occurrences?
We
It's useful sometimes to disable the softlockup checker at boottime.
Especially if it triggers during a distro install.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6/init/main.c~ 2006-03-05 00:45:51.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/init/main.c 2006-03-05 00:49:41.0
It's useful sometimes to disable the softlockup checker at boottime.
Especially if it triggers during a distro install.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/init/main.c~ 2006-03-05 00:45:51.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/init/main.c 2006-03-05 00:49:41.0
6 matches
Mail list logo
