On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:52:15AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > Instead of *= 0.5, try /= 2.0
>
> Yes indeed you've found a bug in the kernel's FP emulation.
> I'll see about fixing it.
Rather than fix the old udiv128 function, which was trying to do
128/128 bit division, I've pulled in a
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 08:58:06PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Is this a serious patch submission or just a call for testing? If the
> former, I need to cook up the sparc bits once it gets in :-)
Huh? A serious patch submission, since it fixes a bug.
Why would you need to cook up any sparc
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:17:12 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why would you need to cook up any sparc bits? Jakub
already has a proper implementaion of qrnnd for sparc...
Nevermind, brain fart.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this
Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:23:42 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rather than fix the old udiv128 function, which was trying to do
128/128 bit division, I've pulled in a subroutine from libgcc that
does 128/64 bit division, which is all we need here.
So i
4 matches
Mail list logo
