Re: Annoying kernel behaviour

2001-06-25 Thread Gerd Knorr
> >There are no conflicts, and PCI should be able to share anyways. > > That's the theory now for some time, has never worked. Even hacking > the SCSI driver, any attempted IRQ sharing kills my systems. Even my > quad ethernet is not successful at sharing IRQs with itself, in 2+ very > dif

Re: Annoying kernel behaviour

2001-06-24 Thread Colonel
In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote: > >Colonel wrote: >> Ah, notice that the IRQ shifted? Perhaps there is something else on >> irq 10, such as the SCSI controller? My video cards always end up on >> that IRQ, perhaps the computer is still accessible via the network? > >I would expect the IRQ

Re: Annoying kernel behaviour

2001-06-24 Thread Dylan Griffiths
Colonel wrote: > Ah, notice that the IRQ shifted? Perhaps there is something else on > irq 10, such as the SCSI controller? My video cards always end up on > that IRQ, perhaps the computer is still accessible via the network? I would expect the IRQ to shift as the system has a different motherb

Re: Annoying kernel behaviour

2001-06-24 Thread Colonel
In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote: >bttv0: Bt848 (rev 18) at 00:0f.0, irq: 10, latency: 64, memory: 0xd79ff000 > ** ^^ this worked in 2.2.19 as >bttv0: Brooktree Bt848 (rev 18) bus: 0, devfn: 88, irq: 11, memory: > >It shouldn't matter, as userspace programs should not be able te fuck te >

Re: Annoying kernel behaviour

2001-06-24 Thread Dylan Griffiths
Colonel wrote: > Look in the people/mingo directory for a patch The patch did not work. > I have: > > Linux video capture interface: v1.00 > bttv: driver version 0.7.63 loaded > bttv: using 2 buffers with 2080k (4160k total) for capture > bttv: Host bridge needs ETBF enabled. > bttv: Bt8xx car

Re: Annoying kernel behaviour

2001-06-23 Thread Colonel
In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote: > > I upgraded a fileserver to 2.4.5 because of the RAID support (the 0.90 >patch I grabbed did not apply cleanly to 2.2.19, despite it being a fresh >copy). Look in the people/mingo directory for a patch > Besides a nice speed increase (the EEPro no

Annoying kernel behaviour

2001-06-22 Thread Dylan Griffiths
I upgraded a fileserver to 2.4.5 because of the RAID support (the 0.90 patch I grabbed did not apply cleanly to 2.2.19, despite it being a fresh copy). Besides a nice speed increase (the EEPro now pumps 10 megs a second, instead of 2 or 3), there is a problem with the video4linux in it.