Re: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree

2015-07-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 06:58:32PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > 2015-07-17 18:43 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown : > > The driver core apparently now does this and we shouldn't be doing it > > statically so we get all this code churn. I'm not sure I understand the > > win TBH. > If you are

Re: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree

2015-07-17 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-17 18:43 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown : > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:11:19PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> I wonder why? Isn't the owner needed for module_get/module_put or am I >> missing something? > > The driver core apparently now does this and we shouldn't be doing it > statically so

Re: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree

2015-07-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:11:19PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > I wonder why? Isn't the owner needed for module_get/module_put or am I > missing something? The driver core apparently now does this and we shouldn't be doing it statically so we get all this code churn. I'm not sure I

Re: Applied regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner to the regulator tree

2015-07-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 06:58:32PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: 2015-07-17 18:43 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org: The driver core apparently now does this and we shouldn't be doing it statically so we get all this code churn. I'm not sure I understand the win TBH. If you

Re: Applied regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner to the regulator tree

2015-07-17 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-17 18:43 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:11:19PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: I wonder why? Isn't the owner needed for module_get/module_put or am I missing something? The driver core apparently now does this and we shouldn't be doing it

Re: Applied regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner to the regulator tree

2015-07-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:11:19PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: I wonder why? Isn't the owner needed for module_get/module_put or am I missing something? The driver core apparently now does this and we shouldn't be doing it statically so we get all this code churn. I'm not sure I

Re: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree

2015-07-16 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-17 6:19 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown : > The patch > >regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner > > has been applied to the regulator tree at > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git > > All being well this means that it will be integrated

Applied "regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner" to the regulator tree

2015-07-16 Thread Mark Brown
The patch regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner has been applied to the regulator tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent

Applied regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner to the regulator tree

2015-07-16 Thread Mark Brown
The patch regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner has been applied to the regulator tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent

Re: Applied regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner to the regulator tree

2015-07-16 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-17 6:19 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org: The patch regulator: 88pm800: Remove owner has been applied to the regulator tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next