> Damacus Porteng writes:
> For grins, I did `dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1024 count=400`
> Obviously, with the limits of ext2, this isn't allowed, however, dd continued
> marrily on its way, tho it spouted an error...
With 2.4 it's allowed.
> I cancelled the dd and went to remov
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, William T Wilson wrote:
> If that's true, then the following C programlet should remove the file:
I lied. You need to include not
Oh no! This is linux-kernel. I thought it was debian-user. Sorry,
didn't mean to waste bandwidth :}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> rm probably stat'd the file beforing removing it -- and failed,
> because it's either old or uses and old library (which isn't LFS
> aware)
If that's true, then the following C programlet should remove the file:
Replace "huge-file-name" with the full
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:16:15AM -0600, Damacus Porteng wrote:
> For grins, I did `dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1024 count=400`
>
> Obviously, with the limits of ext2, this isn't allowed, however, dd continued
> marrily on its way, tho it spouted an error...
>
> I cancelled the dd and w
For grins, I did `dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1024 count=400`
Obviously, with the limits of ext2, this isn't allowed, however, dd continued
marrily on its way, tho it spouted an error...
I cancelled the dd and went to remove the file, though the following occured:
root@obfuscated:/home/f
5 matches
Mail list logo
