Re: Arndale Timer Interrupt Question

2014-01-24 Thread Tomasz Figa
On 23.01.2014 07:10, Mj Embd wrote: On 1/10/14, Tomasz Figa wrote: Hi, On 09.01.2014 13:52, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: added linux-samsung-soc to cc:, it is a better suited list for this question On Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:30:56 AM Mj Embd wrote: I am a bit confused on the in

Re: Arndale Timer Interrupt Question

2014-01-22 Thread Mj Embd
On 1/10/14, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi, > > On 09.01.2014 13:52, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> >> added linux-samsung-soc to cc:, >> it is a better suited list for this question >> >> On Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:30:56 AM Mj Embd wrote: >>> I am a bit confused on the interrupt number for CN

Re: Arndale Timer Interrupt Question

2014-01-10 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi, On 09.01.2014 13:52, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: added linux-samsung-soc to cc:, it is a better suited list for this question On Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:30:56 AM Mj Embd wrote: I am a bit confused on the interrupt number for CNTVIRQ..CNTHPIRQ. Can you please help here. As per

Re: Arndale Timer Interrupt Question

2014-01-09 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
added linux-samsung-soc to cc:, it is a better suited list for this question On Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:30:56 AM Mj Embd wrote: > I am a bit confused on the interrupt number for CNTVIRQ..CNTHPIRQ. Can > you please help here. > > As per the exynos5 public manual > What is the difference bet

Arndale Timer Interrupt Question

2014-01-08 Thread Mj Embd
I am a bit confused on the interrupt number for CNTVIRQ..CNTHPIRQ. Can you please help here. As per the exynos5 public manual What is the difference between  CPU_nCNTHPIRQ[0] and CNTHPIRQ. While the later has an interrupt ID 26, the former is part of a group with combined interrupt id as 33 for