Re: Automatic NUMA balancing patches for tip-urgent/stable

2013-10-29 Thread Mel Gorman
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:41:02AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > Bah, I have tip as a remote tree but looked at my local copy of > > the commits in the incorrect branch. Lets try this again > > > > 37bf06375c90a42fe07b9bebdb07bc316ae5a0ce..afcae2655b0ab67e65f161b1bb21

Re: Automatic NUMA balancing patches for tip-urgent/stable

2013-10-29 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman wrote: > Bah, I have tip as a remote tree but looked at my local copy of > the commits in the incorrect branch. Lets try this again > > 37bf06375c90a42fe07b9bebdb07bc316ae5a0ce..afcae2655b0ab67e65f161b1bb214efcfa1db415 Ok, these work a lot better and cherry-pick cleanly on top of

Re: Automatic NUMA balancing patches for tip-urgent/stable

2013-10-29 Thread Mel Gorman
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:48:56AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > Would be nice if you gave me all the specific SHA1 tags of > > > sched/core that are required for the fix. We can certainly use a > > > range to make it all safer to apply. > > > > Of course. The rang

Re: Automatic NUMA balancing patches for tip-urgent/stable

2013-10-29 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman wrote: > > Would be nice if you gave me all the specific SHA1 tags of > > sched/core that are required for the fix. We can certainly use a > > range to make it all safer to apply. > > Of course. The range of the relevant commits in tip/sched/core is > ca4be374c5c0ab3d8b84fb2861d6

Re: Automatic NUMA balancing patches for tip-urgent/stable

2013-10-29 Thread Mel Gorman
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 02:11:48PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:28:38AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > This series has roughly the same goals as previous versions despite the > > > size. It reduces overhead of automatic balancing through scan

Re: Automatic NUMA balancing patches for tip-urgent/stable

2013-10-26 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mel Gorman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:28:38AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > This series has roughly the same goals as previous versions despite the > > size. It reduces overhead of automatic balancing through scan rate reduction > > and the avoidance of TLB flushes. It selects a prefer

Automatic NUMA balancing patches for tip-urgent/stable

2013-10-24 Thread Mel Gorman
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:28:38AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > This series has roughly the same goals as previous versions despite the > size. It reduces overhead of automatic balancing through scan rate reduction > and the avoidance of TLB flushes. It selects a preferred node and moves tasks > towa