On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 23:58 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> If this is true, then ATI probably won't be able to tell us anything
> useful, so we're only going to find out if people in the Thinkpad
> division are willing to tell us something useful (and their track
> record for being helpful has not
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 10:48:21AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> I'm hesitant to switch a whitelist because of a couple of settings in
> there that are specific to the way the chip is wired on the mobo.
> Apparently, thinkpads are similar enough to Macs, but I wouldn't bet on
> this
> What I would suggest doing is changing the code to use a blacklist
> instead of a whitelist, and make it optional with a CONFIG option that
> is marked experimental, and then get it into the mainline for
> additional testing. If we can get ATI to give us the right way to do
> it, great, but if
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 15:40, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
> > radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
> > and reliable. During S3 I've measured a
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I've sort-of been waiting for ATI to tell me how to retreive the proper
memory register setting from the BIOS, since the code in there currently
is quite powerbook specific, and might not write the exact correct value
on all models. I suppose it works fine on yours so
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 03:51:19PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I've sort-of been waiting for ATI to tell me how to retreive the proper
> memory register setting from the BIOS, since the code in there currently
> is quite powerbook specific, and might not write the exact correct value
>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 03:51:19PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I've sort-of been waiting for ATI to tell me how to retreive the proper
memory register setting from the BIOS, since the code in there currently
is quite powerbook specific, and might not write the exact correct value
on
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I've sort-of been waiting for ATI to tell me how to retreive the proper
memory register setting from the BIOS, since the code in there currently
is quite powerbook specific, and might not write the exact correct value
on all models. I suppose it works fine on yours so
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 15:40, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power
What I would suggest doing is changing the code to use a blacklist
instead of a whitelist, and make it optional with a CONFIG option that
is marked experimental, and then get it into the mainline for
additional testing. If we can get ATI to give us the right way to do
it, great, but if they
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 10:48:21AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I'm hesitant to switch a whitelist because of a couple of settings in
there that are specific to the way the chip is wired on the mobo.
Apparently, thinkpads are similar enough to Macs, but I wouldn't bet on
this beeing
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 23:58 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
If this is true, then ATI probably won't be able to tell us anything
useful, so we're only going to find out if people in the Thinkpad
division are willing to tell us something useful (and their track
record for being helpful has not
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 22:46 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > I've got the e100 and with WOL disabled and Matthew's hacked radeontool
> > power consumption decreases to 970 mWh.
>
> I have a T40p, and with the following patches
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I've got the e100 and with WOL disabled and Matthew's hacked radeontool
> power consumption decreases to 970 mWh.
I have a T40p, and with the following patches (versus 2.6.11) and the
following sleep script, I have power
Martin Josefsson wrote:
> I also have an X31 and I noticed that the e1000 has Wake-On-Lan enabled
> by default and the S3 code doesn't disable that (kind of defeats the
> purpose :)
> Disabling that will make the e1000 driver power down the chip during S3.
>
> I've had mine suspended for 2-3 days
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Radeons don't actually power down in D3 unless some registers are set,
> and even then the kernel doesn't currently have any code that would put
> the Radeon in D3. If you're willing to test something, could you try the
> code at
>
>
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Radeons don't actually power down in D3 unless some registers are set,
and even then the kernel doesn't currently have any code that would put
the Radeon in D3. If you're willing to test something, could you try the
code at
http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~mjg59/radeon/
Martin Josefsson wrote:
I also have an X31 and I noticed that the e1000 has Wake-On-Lan enabled
by default and the S3 code doesn't disable that (kind of defeats the
purpose :)
Disabling that will make the e1000 driver power down the chip during S3.
I've had mine suspended for 2-3 days at
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
I've got the e100 and with WOL disabled and Matthew's hacked radeontool
power consumption decreases to 970 mWh.
I have a T40p, and with the following patches (versus 2.6.11) and the
following sleep script, I have power
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 22:46 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
I've got the e100 and with WOL disabled and Matthew's hacked radeontool
power consumption decreases to 970 mWh.
I have a T40p, and with the following patches (versus
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 15:26 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
> radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
> and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power consumption of 1400
> to 1500 mWh (using
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
> radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
> and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power consumption of 1400
> to 1500 mWh (using 512 megabytes of
Hi,
I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power consumption of 1400
to 1500 mWh (using 512 megabytes of RAM). Is there still room for
optimization? What's the
Hi,
I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power consumption of 1400
to 1500 mWh (using 512 megabytes of RAM). Is there still room for
optimization? What's the
Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power consumption of 1400
to 1500 mWh (using 512 megabytes of RAM). Is
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 15:26 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Hi,
I'm using an IBM Thinkpad X31. With stock 2.6.11 and the additional
radeontool to power-off the backlight in suspend, S3 works very well
and reliable. During S3 I've measured a power consumption of 1400
to 1500 mWh (using 512
26 matches
Mail list logo
