On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 07:13:02PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 02-07-20 09:37:38, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:22:02PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 01-07-20 11:45:52, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > >From c97afecd32c0db5e024be9ba72f43d22974f5bcd
On Thu 02-07-20 09:37:38, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:22:02PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 01-07-20 11:45:52, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >From c97afecd32c0db5e024be9ba72f43d22974f5bcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Roman Gushchin
> > > Date: Wed, 1
On Thu 02-07-20 18:35:31, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 7/2/20 6:22 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 01-07-20 11:45:52, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > [...]
> >> >From c97afecd32c0db5e024be9ba72f43d22974f5bcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Roman Gushchin
> >> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:05:32 -0700
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:35:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 7/2/20 6:22 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 01-07-20 11:45:52, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > [...]
> >> >From c97afecd32c0db5e024be9ba72f43d22974f5bcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Roman Gushchin
> >> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:22:02PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 01-07-20 11:45:52, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> [...]
> > >From c97afecd32c0db5e024be9ba72f43d22974f5bcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Roman Gushchin
> > Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:05:32 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm: kmem: make
On 7/2/20 6:22 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 01-07-20 11:45:52, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> [...]
>> >From c97afecd32c0db5e024be9ba72f43d22974f5bcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Roman Gushchin
>> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:05:32 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] mm: kmem: make memcg_kmem_enabled()
On Wed 01-07-20 11:45:52, Roman Gushchin wrote:
[...]
> >From c97afecd32c0db5e024be9ba72f43d22974f5bcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roman Gushchin
> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:05:32 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: kmem: make memcg_kmem_enabled() irreversible
>
> Historically the kernel memory
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 11:46 AM Roman Gushchin wrote:
...
> --
>
> From c97afecd32c0db5e024be9ba72f43d22974f5bcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roman Gushchin
> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:05:32 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: kmem: make memcg_kmem_enabled() irreversible
>
> Historically the kernel
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 09:25:08PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 21:19, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 12:22:03PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 00:16, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:29:04AM
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 21:19, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 12:22:03PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 00:16, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:29:04AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > Smells like a different observable
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 12:22:03PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 00:16, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:29:04AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Smells like a different observable problem with the same/similar culprit
> > > as
> > >
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 00:16, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:29:04AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Smells like a different observable problem with the same/similar culprit
> > as
> >
On Wed 01-07-20 11:45:52, Roman Gushchin wrote:
[...]
> So it makes me think that somehow memcg_kmem_enabled() became false
> after being true, which can cause refcounting problems as well.
Isn't this a similar class of problem as
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:29:04AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Smells like a different observable problem with the same/similar culprit
> as
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYtrgF_EZHi0vi+HyWiXT5LGggDhVXtNspc=OzzFhL=x...@mail.gmail.com
>
> On Wed 01-07-20 13:48:57, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 13:59, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> Smells like a different observable problem with the same/similar culprit
> as
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYtrgF_EZHi0vi+HyWiXT5LGggDhVXtNspc=OzzFhL=x...@mail.gmail.com
Before I start bisecting here I am sharing more details of the
Smells like a different observable problem with the same/similar culprit
as
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYtrgF_EZHi0vi+HyWiXT5LGggDhVXtNspc=OzzFhL=x...@mail.gmail.com
On Wed 01-07-20 13:48:57, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> While running LTP mm test suite on x86_64 device the BUG: Bad page
> state in
While running LTP mm test suite on x86_64 device the BUG: Bad page
state in process
noticed on linux-next 20200630 tag.
Steps to reproduce:
- boot linux-next 20200630 kernel on x86_64 device
- cd /opt/ltp
- ./runltp -f mm
metadata:
git branch: master
git repo:
17 matches
Mail list logo