you might see it here:
>> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/15/222
>> >
>> > It is certainly very similar, and probably has the same root cause.
>> > Though, the trace isn't an exact match. So, who should look into
>> > this?
>>
>> Th
;
>> Reported yet, you might see it here:
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/15/222
>
> It is certainly very similar, and probably has the same root cause.
> Though, the trace isn't an exact match. So, who should look into
> this?
The trace needn't b
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:58:40 -0800
Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got several of the messages below on 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 .
>
>
> Dec 29 03:34:08 10 kernel: [ 264.519401] BUG: at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:50
> kmap_atomic()
doh, I had a copy-n-paste error in the deb
Got several of the messages below on 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 .
Dec 29 03:34:08 10 kernel: [ 264.519401] BUG: at arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:50
kmap_atomic()
Dec 29 03:34:08 10 kernel: [ 264.524973] []
show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
Dec 29 03:34:08 10 kernel: [ 264.530129] [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
Dec 29
4 matches
Mail list logo
