On Wed 07-11-12 22:21:19, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> Hello Jan,
>
> tried on 3.7-rc4, works great! thanks!
>
> will You submit as-is, or do You plan any further changes?
> do You plan to backport for stable kernels? I can try it and send for review
> if You want (although we'll have to wait till it'
Hello Jan,
tried on 3.7-rc4, works great! thanks!
will You submit as-is, or do You plan any further changes?
do You plan to backport for stable kernels? I can try it and send for review
if You want (although we'll have to wait till it's upstream anyways)
cheers
nik
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:
On Thu 01-11-12 23:50:53, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 01-11-12 15:23:25, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> > Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.178123] SysRq : Show Blocked State
> > Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.180555] taskPC
> > stack pid father
> > Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.18
Il 02/11/2012 11:40, Nikola Ciprich ha scritto:
I saw this behavior (task-hang) when I tested the fsfreeze code. I was
writing a little patch to replace fsfreeze's wait queue with a killable
queue, in this way the user can do at least "kill -9", but since the
behavior was the same before your pat
> I saw this behavior (task-hang) when I tested the fsfreeze code. I was
> writing a little patch to replace fsfreeze's wait queue with a killable
> queue, in this way the user can do at least "kill -9", but since the
> behavior was the same before your patch I didn't send it. I don't know if we
>
Il 01/11/2012 23:50, Jan Kara ha scritto:
On Thu 01-11-12 15:23:25, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.178123] SysRq : Show Blocked State
Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.180555] taskPC stack
pid father
Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.180592] fsfreeze
On Thu 01-11-12 15:23:25, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.178123] SysRq : Show Blocked State
> Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.180555] taskPC stack
> pid father
> Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.180592] fsfreeze D 0
> 421
Hi Jan,
here it goes:
Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.178123] SysRq : Show Blocked State
Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.180555] taskPC stack
pid father
Nov 1 14:23:25 vmnci22 [ 1075.180592] fsfreeze D 0
4215 4195 0x
Nov 1 14:23:2
On Thu 01-11-12 10:37:23, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 31-10-12 13:46:00, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > thanks for the reply, sure, I'll gather and post requested info.
> > One more note before that, the problem is with psacct, not audit
> > - psacct if I'm not mistaken (and as opposed t
On Wed 31-10-12 13:46:00, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> thanks for the reply, sure, I'll gather and post requested info.
> One more note before that, the problem is with psacct, not audit
> - psacct if I'm not mistaken (and as opposed to audit) doesn't
> use any userspace, kernel dumps inf
Hi Jan,
thanks for the reply, sure, I'll gather and post requested info.
One more note before that, the problem is with psacct, not audit
- psacct if I'm not mistaken (and as opposed to audit) doesn't
use any userspace, kernel dumps information directly to fs,
which might the reason for deadloc
Hello,
On Tue 23-10-12 11:43:51, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> while trying to create consistent backups of KVM guest, I've discovered
> that fsfreeze always hangs.. deeper investigation revealed psacct to be the
> culprit.
> When psacct is disabled, fsfreeze works fine, when enabled, the command nev
Hi,
while trying to create consistent backups of KVM guest, I've discovered
that fsfreeze always hangs.. deeper investigation revealed psacct to be the
culprit.
When psacct is disabled, fsfreeze works fine, when enabled, the command never
returns.
I suppose that the problem is /var is not on sep
13 matches
Mail list logo
