Re: BUG: wedged processes, test program supplied

2006-12-19 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 01:05 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote: > On 12/20/06, Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 21:46 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote: > > > Somebody PLEASE try this... > > > > I was having enough fun with cloninator (which was whitespace munged > > btw). >

Re: BUG: wedged processes, test program supplied

2006-12-19 Thread Albert Cahalan
On 12/20/06, Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 21:46 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote: > Somebody PLEASE try this... I was having enough fun with cloninator (which was whitespace munged btw). Anything stuck? Besides refusing to die, that beast slays debuggers left and

Re: BUG: wedged processes, test program supplied

2006-12-19 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 21:46 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote: > Somebody PLEASE try this... I was having enough fun with cloninator (which was whitespace munged btw). > Normally, when a process dies it becomes a zombie. > If the parent dies (before or after the child), the child > is adopted by init.

BUG: wedged processes, test program supplied

2006-12-19 Thread Albert Cahalan
Somebody PLEASE try this... Normally, when a process dies it becomes a zombie. If the parent dies (before or after the child), the child is adopted by init. Init will reap the child. The program included below DOES NOT get reaped. Do like so: gcc -m32 -O2 -std=gnu99 -o foo foo.c while true; do