He needs to take it up with Dan Bernstein
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Here is a message from nntp://news.grc.com/news.feedback
Somebody with good knowledge of the Linux SYN-Cookies should
probably drop by and discuss the matter...
Regards
Joerg
Subject: A *significant* dilemma . . .
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:15:59 -0700
From: Steve Gibson <[EMAIL
Here is a message from nntp://news.grc.com/news.feedback
Somebody with good knowledge of the Linux SYN-Cookies should
probably drop by and discuss the matter...
Regards
Joerg
Subject: A *significant* dilemma . . .
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:15:59 -0700
From: Steve Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He needs to take it up with Dan Bernstein
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> So is he right, is his solution better than SYNcookies and there is
> something to be learned from his solution? Or does someone need to take
> him to school on the issue.
He isnt preserving the negotiated TCP MSS.
Other issues:
- If his ISN is the ip address then its a constant whi
I dont know how many here read /. but recently someone's gone round
touting a new SYN defense system that he claims is better than SYNcookies.
http://grc.com/r/NoMoreDoS2.htm
Specifically, Steve Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> claims:
I followed those links and read about SYN Cookies yes
I dont know how many here read /. but recently someone's gone round
touting a new SYN defense system that he claims is better than SYNcookies.
http://grc.com/rd/NoMoreDoS2.htm
Specifically, Steve Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] claims:
QUOTE
I followed those links and read about SYN Cookies
7 matches
Mail list logo
