Re: Breakage with raid in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 [Regression in mm]

Hi, Reuben Farrelly wrote: At 12:58 a.m. 15/01/2005, Andrew Morton wrote: Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Something seems to have broken with 2.6.11-rc1-mm1, which worked ok with > 2.6.10-mm3. > > NET: Registered protocol family 17 > Starting balanced_irq > BIOS EDD facility v0.16

Re: Breakage with raid in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 [Regression in mm]

Hi, Reuben Farrelly wrote: At 12:58 a.m. 15/01/2005, Andrew Morton wrote: Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something seems to have broken with 2.6.11-rc1-mm1, which worked ok with 2.6.10-mm3. NET: Registered protocol family 17 Starting balanced_irq BIOS EDD facility v0.16

Re: Breakage with raid in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 [Regression in mm]

Randy.Dunlap wrote (ao): > Reuben Farrelly wrote: > >At 12:58 a.m. 15/01/2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > >>Reuben Farrelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Something seems to have broken with 2.6.11-rc1-mm1, which worked ok > >>with > >>> 2.6.10-mm3. > >>> > >>> NET: Registered protocol

Re: Breakage with raid in 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 [Regression in mm]

Randy.Dunlap wrote (ao): Reuben Farrelly wrote: At 12:58 a.m. 15/01/2005, Andrew Morton wrote: Reuben Farrelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something seems to have broken with 2.6.11-rc1-mm1, which worked ok with 2.6.10-mm3. NET: Registered protocol family 17 Starting balanced_irq