Re: Bug in 2.2 update_vm_cache_conditional?

On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 06:49:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > that manifests itself only on S/390: I guess it could trigger also on sparc. > Do you agree that this is a bug? What do you think of this fix: That's a severe bug, fix is obviously right. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this li

Bug in 2.2 update_vm_cache_conditional?

Hi Alan, there appears to a bug in update_vm_cache_conditional that manifests itself only on S/390: update_vm_cache_conditional is called with a source_address parameter that can either be a kernel or a user space virtual address, depending on how get_fs() is set. update_vm_cache_conditional