On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:11:43 Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y && CONFIG_COMPACTION=y
> > > case
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:11:43 Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y && CONFIG_COMPACTION=y
> > > case
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:11:43 Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y && CONFIG_COMPACTION=y case
> > work:
> >
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm: compaction
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:11:43AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y && CONFIG_COMPACTION=y case
> > work:
> >
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm: comp
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y && CONFIG_COMPACTION=y case
> work:
>
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and no
> pages were isolated -
Hi,
On Monday 08 October 2012 10:48:07 Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:06:54PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Mel,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 02, 20
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:06:54PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012
Hi Mel,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > So this really isn't
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > So this really isn't all that new, but I just wanted to confirm my
> > > > results from last week
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > So this really isn't all that new, but I just wanted to confirm my
> > > results from last week. We'll see if bisection shows up something
> > > interesting.
> >
> >
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > So this really isn't all that new, but I just wanted to confirm my
> > results from last week. We'll see if bisection shows up something
> > interesting.
>
> I just finished bisecting this and git reports:
>
> 3750280f8bd0e
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:24:29PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:43:32PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:39:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:07:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:1
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:39:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:07:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:07:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've been running a few tests and indeed this solves the obvious problem
> > that the coherent pool cannot be created at boot (which in turn caused
> > the ethernet adapter to fail on Tegra).
> >
> > However I've been wor
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On 09/
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > >> I hope this patch fixes the bug
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > >> I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
> > >> but has some problem about descript
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >> I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
> >> but has some problem about description or someone has better idea,
> >> feel free to modify and resend to a
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
>> but has some problem about description or someone has better idea,
>> feel free to modify and resend to akpm, Please.
>>
>
> A full revert is overkill. Can the following patch be t
> I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
> but has some problem about description or someone has better idea,
> feel free to modify and resend to akpm, Please.
>
A full revert is overkill. Can the following patch be tested as a
potential replacement please?
---8<---
mm:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 08:56:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:43:30PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
> > > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Marek,
> > > >
> > >
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:43:30PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
> > Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Marek,
> > >
> > > any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> > >
On 09/28/2012 08:43 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> From 24a547855fa2bd4212a779cc73997837148310b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Minchan Kim
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:28:32 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] revert mm: compaction: iron out isolate_freepages_block()
> and isolate_freepages_range()
>
> [1] mad
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:43:30PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
> > Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Marek,
> > >
> > > any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> > >
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
> Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> > haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
> > b
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
> bit of restructuring of various memory allocation bits lately. I wasn't
> able t
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:29 PM Thierry Reding wrote:
> > any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> > haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
> > bit of restructur
Hello,
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:29 PM Thierry Reding wrote:
> any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
> bit of restructuring of various memory allocation bits lately. I wasn't
> able to t
Hi Marek,
any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
bit of restructuring of various memory allocation bits lately. I wasn't
able to track the problem down, though.
What I see is this during boot (with
31 matches
Mail list logo
