Re: CONFIG_THERM_PM72 is missing from .config from recent kernels (2.6.10, 2.6.11)

2005-01-31 Thread Maurice Volaski
Maurice Volaski wrote: CONFIG_THERM_PM72 is required for thermal management in at least Macs, most notably the PowerMac G5. Without it, the computer will run its fans at the max and is very loud. It's missing from .config in at least a few releases of recent kernels (2.6.10, 2.6.11). Does anyo

Re: [gentoo-ppc-dev] CONFIG_THERM_PM72 is missing from .config from recent kernels (2.6.10, 2.6.11)

2005-01-30 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 18:41 -0500, Maurice Volaski wrote: > From what I can tell, the .config file is built up from different > files. I just looked at gentoo-dev-sources for this version and it > is, in fact, present for ppc64 in > /usr/src/linux-2.6.10-gentoo-r6/arch/ppc64/defconfig > > That

Re: CONFIG_THERM_PM72 is missing from .config from recent kernels (2.6.10, 2.6.11)

2005-01-29 Thread Randy.Dunlap
Maurice Volaski wrote: CONFIG_THERM_PM72 is required for thermal management in at least Macs, most notably the PowerMac G5. Without it, the computer will run its fans at the max and is very loud. It's missing from .config in at least a few releases of recent kernels (2.6.10, 2.6.11). Does anyo

Re: [gentoo-ppc-dev] CONFIG_THERM_PM72 is missing from .config from recent kernels (2.6.10, 2.6.11)

2005-01-29 Thread Maurice Volaski
Hello Maurice It's missing from .config in at least a few releases of recent kernels (2.6.10, 2.6.11). Definitly not true, at least for ppc32. Note that.. 1) I looked only at official kernel source code and 2) I looked only at a few releases, not every patchset. and 3) I looked only at the result

CONFIG_THERM_PM72 is missing from .config from recent kernels (2.6.10, 2.6.11)

2005-01-29 Thread Maurice Volaski
CONFIG_THERM_PM72 is required for thermal management in at least Macs, most notably the PowerMac G5. Without it, the computer will run its fans at the max and is very loud. It's missing from .config in at least a few releases of recent kernels (2.6.10, 2.6.11). Does anyone know why? -- Maurice