On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I like common_x86_capability[], and I like that it's _not_ a struct
> cpuinfo_x86 - saves us from wasting time on inventing "common" values
> for the other cpuinfo_x86 fields (and'ing, or'ing, min'ing, etc.).
That was my first idea. I decided to implem
Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> I wonder (you or hpa may very quickly point out why this is stupid
> and impossible), could we move the identify_cpu() calls into
> cpu_init()? I used to think it was called too early for that, but
> now I see it's already using current, smp_processor_id(), printk().
>
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > diff -up --recursive --new-file linux-2.4.0-ac12.macro/include/asm-i386/bugs.h
>linux-2.4.0-ac12/include/asm-i386/bugs.h
> > --- linux-2.4.0-ac12.macro/include/asm-i386/bugs.h Sun Jan 28 09:41:20 2001
> > +++ linux-2.4.0-ac12/include/asm-i386/
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> Following is the current state of my CPU capabilities rework. It
> introduces a new global variable, common_x86_capability, which holds the
> common set of flags for CPUs. The boot_cpu_data is used appropriately
> again, i.e. it's treated as cur
Hi there,
I like what you have done here, but there are a few things...
> diff -up --recursive --new-file linux-2.4.0-ac12.macro/include/asm-i386/bugs.h
>linux-2.4.0-ac12/include/asm-i386/bugs.h
> --- linux-2.4.0-ac12.macro/include/asm-i386/bugs.h Sun Jan 28 09:41:20 2001
> +++ linux-2.4.0
Hi,
Following is the current state of my CPU capabilities rework. It
introduces a new global variable, common_x86_capability, which holds the
common set of flags for CPUs. The boot_cpu_data is used appropriately
again, i.e. it's treated as current_cpu_data before smp_store_cpu_info()
is called
6 matches
Mail list logo
