Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series

2017-05-15 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:53:50PM -0700, Steven Pease wrote: > Is there any particular reason that the CVE appears to be filed > against 4.4.60? Or is this just a mistake? > > http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2016-10229/ I have no idea why. Maybe they mentionned the current version at the momen

Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series

2017-05-15 Thread Steven Pease
Is there any particular reason that the CVE appears to be filed against 4.4.60? Or is this just a mistake? http://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2016-10229/ - Steven On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:09:53PM -0700, Steven Pease wrote: >> Hi, >> >> T

Re: CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series

2017-05-15 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:09:53PM -0700, Steven Pease wrote: > Hi, > > This is my first post - not currently subscribed so please CC me. :) I > searched a bit for this question, but couldn't find an answer (Googled > '2016-10229 site:lkml.org'). > > Does CVE-2016-10229 affect the newest version

CVE-2016-10229 in 4.4.x series

2017-05-15 Thread Steven Pease
Hi, This is my first post - not currently subscribed so please CC me. :) I searched a bit for this question, but couldn't find an answer (Googled '2016-10229 site:lkml.org'). Does CVE-2016-10229 affect the newest version of the 4.4.x kernel series (currently 4.4.68) and are there any plans to fix