Re: Can't compile linus 2.2.17 with latest gcc due to checksum.S

2000-09-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 05:42:59PM +0200, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote: > * Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Sep 26. 2000 17:36]: > > > Maybe this can be fixed for 2.96, but it breaks badly elsewhere (doesn't > > > compile; kernel builds but hangs/crashes at boot; kernel appears to work > > > fine

Re: Can't compile linus 2.2.17 with latest gcc due to checksum.S

2000-09-26 Thread Erik Mouw
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 10:37:01 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > ** Reply to message from Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 26 Sep > 2000 10:45:10 -0400 >> Maybe this can be fixed for 2.96, but it breaks badly elsewhere (doesn't >> compile; kernel builds but hangs/crashes at boot; kernel appears

Re: Can't compile linus 2.2.17 with latest gcc due to checksum.S

2000-09-26 Thread Horst von Brand
Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [...] > Why is 2.96 so screwed up? I mean, the version numbers imply that 2.96 is a > minor bugfix over 2.95, but your comments make it sound like it's a major > change. It's the kernel which is screwed up, not the compiler. The kernel uses gcc-specific (ev

Re: Can't compile linus 2.2.17 with latest gcc due to checksum.S

2000-09-26 Thread Mads Martin Joergensen
* Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Sep 26. 2000 17:36]: > > Maybe this can be fixed for 2.96, but it breaks badly elsewhere (doesn't > > compile; kernel builds but hangs/crashes at boot; kernel appears to work > > fine while it is busy eating your disk; ...) > > Why is 2.96 so screwed up? I mean,

Re: Can't compile linus 2.2.17 with latest gcc due to checksum.S

2000-09-26 Thread Timur Tabi
** Reply to message from Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 26 Sep 2000 10:45:10 -0400 > Maybe this can be fixed for 2.96, but it breaks badly elsewhere (doesn't > compile; kernel builds but hangs/crashes at boot; kernel appears to work > fine while it is busy eating your disk; ...) Wh

Re: Can't compile linus 2.2.17 with latest gcc due to checksum.S

2000-09-26 Thread Horst von Brand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael N. Lipp) > I can't compile the latest linux kernel with the latest gcc due to a > strange define in checksum.S. The gcc preprocessor complains about > the usage of elipses in the macros linux-2.2.x are strictly egcs-1.1.x or gcc-2.95.x at the latest. 2.96 won't work, an

Re: ["Michael N. Lipp" ] Can't compile linus 2.2.17 with latest gcc due to checksum.S

2000-09-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 08:20:49AM +0200, Michael N. Lipp wrote: > Hi, > > I can't compile the latest linux kernel with the latest gcc due to a > strange define in checksum.S. The gcc preprocessor complains about > the usage of elipses in the macros > > #define SRC(y...) \ >

["Michael N. Lipp" ] Can't compile linus 2.2.17 with latest gcc due to checksum.S

2000-09-25 Thread Michael N. Lipp
Hi, I can't compile the latest linux kernel with the latest gcc due to a strange define in checksum.S. The gcc preprocessor complains about the usage of elipses in the macros #define SRC(y...) \ : y;\ .section __ex_table, "a";