"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can we please kill zImage? In addition to be completely useless for
> modern kernels, it causes unnecessary complexity in boot loaders.
I hope so.
BTW: I'd just kill old zImage and make it identical to bzImage
(I mean "make zImage" would now
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Bruce Ashfield wrote:
These beasts are still alive and kicking. I boot a handful of
arm and ppc boards on a frequent basis that are zImage
only. The kicker is I don't have the bootloader source for
most of them, so changing to a different image format is
tough at best.
Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> These beasts are still alive and kicking. I boot a handful of
> arm and ppc boards on a frequent basis that are zImage
> only. The kicker is I don't have the bootloader source for
> most of them, so changing to a different image format is
> tough at best.
>
Sorry, the
Bruce Ashfield wrote:
These beasts are still alive and kicking. I boot a handful of
arm and ppc boards on a frequent basis that are zImage
only. The kicker is I don't have the bootloader source for
most of them, so changing to a different image format is
tough at best.
Sorry, the
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Bruce Ashfield wrote:
These beasts are still alive and kicking. I boot a handful of
arm and ppc boards on a frequent basis that are zImage
only. The kicker is I don't have the bootloader source for
most of them, so changing to a different image format is
tough at best.
H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we please kill zImage? In addition to be completely useless for
modern kernels, it causes unnecessary complexity in boot loaders.
I hope so.
BTW: I'd just kill old zImage and make it identical to bzImage
(I mean make zImage would now produce
On 6/11/07, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I brought this up a few years ago, and had it shot down, because of a
few poorly substantiated claims of zImage-only machines; those claims
really need to be debugged since they might indicate A20-related failures.
These beasts are still
I brought this up a few years ago, and had it shot down, because of a
few poorly substantiated claims of zImage-only machines; those claims
really need to be debugged since they might indicate A20-related failures.
Anyway...
Can we please kill zImage? In addition to be completely useless for
I brought this up a few years ago, and had it shot down, because of a
few poorly substantiated claims of zImage-only machines; those claims
really need to be debugged since they might indicate A20-related failures.
Anyway...
Can we please kill zImage? In addition to be completely useless for
On 6/11/07, H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I brought this up a few years ago, and had it shot down, because of a
few poorly substantiated claims of zImage-only machines; those claims
really need to be debugged since they might indicate A20-related failures.
These beasts are still
10 matches
Mail list logo