On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:47:49AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Not certain because I haven't looked at what happens with the error
> > code, but I think this might not be right. auditd can be explictly
> > told not to audit certain events, in which case it is normal and
> > expected that ab
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:36:06AM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Following on from the previous patch that fixed an oops, these
> > are all the other similar code patterns in the tree with the same
> > checks added. I never saw these
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> Following on from the previous patch that fixed an oops, these
> are all the other similar code patterns in the tree with the same
> checks added. I never saw these causing problems, but checking
> this everywhere seems to make more sense than
Following on from the previous patch that fixed an oops, these
are all the other similar code patterns in the tree with the same
checks added. I never saw these causing problems, but checking
this everywhere seems to make more sense than every subsequent
routine that gets passed 'ab' having to
Following on from the previous patch that fixed an oops, these
are all the other similar code patterns in the tree with the same
checks added. I never saw these causing problems, but checking
this everywhere seems to make more sense than every subsequent
routine that gets passed 'ab' having to
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
Following on from the previous patch that fixed an oops, these
are all the other similar code patterns in the tree with the same
checks added. I never saw these causing problems, but checking
this everywhere seems to make
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:36:06AM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
Following on from the previous patch that fixed an oops, these
are all the other similar code patterns in the tree with the same
checks added. I never saw
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:47:49AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Not certain because I haven't looked at what happens with the error
code, but I think this might not be right. auditd can be explictly
told not to audit certain events, in which case it is normal and
expected that ab would
8 matches
Mail list logo