On 1/13/07, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:38:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> amd64 will only work on a core2duo if it's a T7200 or higher - the
> lower numbers are 32-bit-only chipsets. I admit not knowing what
> exact variant the Mac has.
2.33GH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:18:31 EST, Bill Davidsen said:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:03:49 EST, Lennart Sorensen said:
I would expect any distribution should work on these (as long as the
kernel they use isn't too old.). Of course if it is a Mac, you
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:54:43 EST, Lennart Sorensen said:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:38:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > CONFIG_MCORE2=y
>
> Oh good. Makes life much simpler for users.
After writing that, I actually went back and *checked* the fine print.
It turns out that unless you ha
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:18:31 EST, Bill Davidsen said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:03:49 EST, Lennart Sorensen said:
> >> I would expect any distribution should work on these (as long as the
> >> kernel they use isn't too old.). Of course if it is a Mac, you need a
> >> di
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:03:49 EST, Lennart Sorensen said:
I would expect any distribution should work on these (as long as the
kernel they use isn't too old.). Of course if it is a Mac, you need a
distribution that supports their firmware (which is of course not a PC
bio
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:38:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> amd64 will only work on a core2duo if it's a T7200 or higher - the
> lower numbers are 32-bit-only chipsets. I admit not knowing what
> exact variant the Mac has.
The Core Duo had 32bit only (being a Pentium M), but the Core 2 D
On 1/13/2007 4:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:03:49 EST, Lennart Sorensen said:
>> I believe the closest optimization for a Core2 is probably the Pentium M
>> (certainly not the P4/netburst). Not entirely sure though.
>
> CONFIG_MCORE2=y
>
> That's probably even closer
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:03:49 EST, Lennart Sorensen said:
>
> I would expect any distribution should work on these (as long as the
> kernel they use isn't too old.). Of course if it is a Mac, you need a
> distribution that supports their firmware (which is of course not a PC
> bios). As long as yo
> Trying to understand, should I set CPUSETS=y
You don't need CPUSETS for this small a system.
But setting it is harmless - for example at least
one major commercial distribution enables CPUSETS
on almost all their product, most of which is running
on PC's less powerful than yours.
CPUSETS provi
On 1/12/07, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would expect any distribution should work on these (as long as the
kernel they use isn't too old.). Of course if it is a Mac, you need a
distribution that supports their firmware (which is of course not a PC
bios). As long as you can bo
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:55:32PM +0530, Sunil Naidu wrote:
> There are 2 cases:-
>
> #1 Intel Pentium 4 Workstation with HyperThreading
>
> Since kernel takes HT as 2 processors, I did say in KConfig as:
>
> CONFIG_SMP= y
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2
> CONFIG_SCHED_MC=not set
> CONFIG_MPENTIUM4=y (Or sh
Hello All,
There are 2 cases:-
#1 Intel Pentium 4 Workstation with HyperThreading
Since kernel takes HT as 2 processors, I did say in KConfig as:
CONFIG_SMP= y
CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2
CONFIG_SCHED_MC=not set
CONFIG_MPENTIUM4=y (Or should I say CONFIG_X86_PC=y)
CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y
CONFIG_SCHED_MC=not s
12 matches
Mail list logo
