On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Hedi Berriche wrote:
>
>> It's regrettable that the code is so subtle. The obvious thing to do
>> would be to check for _CBA, and if it doesn't exist, look
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Hedi Berriche wrote:
> It's regrettable that the code is so subtle. The obvious thing to do
> would be to check for _CBA, and if it doesn't exist, look for an MCFG
> entry. But for various historical reasons
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Hedi Berriche wrote:
> Chaps,
>
> The following failure was encountered on hardware that does *not*
> implement a _CBA method which is AFAICT (and confirmed to me by BIOS
> chaps) optional.
_CBA is definitely optional.
> [1.230647] PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 000
Chaps,
The following failure was encountered on hardware that does *not*
implement a _CBA method which is AFAICT (and confirmed to me by BIOS
chaps) optional.
[1.230647] PCI: MMCONFIG for domain [bus 00-0c] at [mem
0x8000-0x80cf] (base 0x8000)
[1.241046] PCI: MMCONFIG fo
4 matches
Mail list logo
