For the sake of completeness following are given the remaining sets of
kernbench results related to this thread.
Setup for kernbench test is as described in previous mails but now all
120 logical CPUs were online in all tests. Test runs were still pinned
to node 0.
Common legend for below tables
For the sake of completeness following are given the remaining sets of
kernbench results related to this thread.
Setup for kernbench test is as described in previous mails but now all
120 logical CPUs were online in all tests. Test runs were still pinned
to node 0.
Common legend for below tables
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 05:25:56PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
...
> Average mean for user/system/elapsed time and standard deviation for each
Oops, of course I meant arithmetic mean.
...
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 05:25:56PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
...
> Average mean for user/system/elapsed time and standard deviation for each
Oops, of course I meant arithmetic mean.
...
I think I still owe some performance numbers to show what is wrong
with systems using pcc-cpufreq with Linux after commit 554c8aa8ecad.
Following are results for kernbench tests (from MMTests test suite).
That's just a kernel compile with different number of compile jobs.
As result the time is
I think I still owe some performance numbers to show what is wrong
with systems using pcc-cpufreq with Linux after commit 554c8aa8ecad.
Following are results for kernbench tests (from MMTests test suite).
That's just a kernel compile with different number of compile jobs.
As result the time is
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> ---8<---
>
>> > OK, the patch is below.
>> >
>> > First, I hope that if "Collaborative Power
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> ---8<---
>
>> > OK, the patch is below.
>> >
>> > First, I hope that if "Collaborative Power
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
---8<---
> > OK, the patch is below.
> >
> > First, I hope that if "Collaborative Power Control" is disabled, it will
> > simply hide the PCCH object and so
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
---8<---
> > OK, the patch is below.
> >
> > First, I hope that if "Collaborative Power Control" is disabled, it will
> > simply hide the PCCH object and so
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 11:36:20 AM CEST Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 11:36:20 AM CEST Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 11:36:20 AM CEST Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 11:36:20 AM CEST Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:36:20AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:36:20AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul
On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 11:36:20 AM CEST Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul
On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 11:36:20 AM CEST Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 17,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:27:21AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 17,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> [cut]
> >>
> >> >
>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> [cut]
> >>
> >> >
>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann
>> wrote:
>>
>> [cut]
>>
>> >
>> > On balance before this commit users could use pcc-cpufreq but had
>> > already
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann
>> wrote:
>>
>> [cut]
>>
>> >
>> > On balance before this commit users could use pcc-cpufreq but had
>> > already
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > On balance before this commit users could use pcc-cpufreq but had
> > already suboptimal performance (compared to say intel_pstate driver
> > which
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > On balance before this commit users could use pcc-cpufreq but had
> > already suboptimal performance (compared to say intel_pstate driver
> > which
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:15:07AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 08:50:48AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
> > idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe performance drop
> > for systems
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
[cut]
>
> On balance before this commit users could use pcc-cpufreq but had
> already suboptimal performance (compared to say intel_pstate driver
> which can be used changing BIOS options).
BTW, I wonder why you need to change the BIOS
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
[cut]
>
> On balance before this commit users could use pcc-cpufreq but had
> already suboptimal performance (compared to say intel_pstate driver
> which can be used changing BIOS options).
BTW, I wonder why you need to change the BIOS
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:15:07AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 08:50:48AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
> > idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe performance drop
> > for systems
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:03:41AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your report!
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann
>>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:03:41AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your report!
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann
>>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 09:33:53AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your report!
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 09:33:53AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your report!
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:03:41AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your report!
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> > wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I've recently noticed that commit
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:03:41AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your report!
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann
> > wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I've recently noticed that commit
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 09:33:53AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your report!
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
> > idle state before stopping the tick")
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 09:33:53AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your report!
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
> > idle state before stopping the tick")
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 08:50:48AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
> idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe performance drop
> for systems using pcc-cpufreq driver. Depending on the number of CPUs
> the system might
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 08:50:48AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
> idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe performance drop
> for systems using pcc-cpufreq driver. Depending on the number of CPUs
> the system might
On 17/07/2018 09:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your report!
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
>> idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe performance
On 17/07/2018 09:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your report!
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
>> idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe performance
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your report!
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
>> idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your report!
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
>> idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe
Hi,
Thanks for your report!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
> idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe performance drop
> for systems using pcc-cpufreq driver. Depending on the
Hi,
Thanks for your report!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
> idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe performance drop
> for systems using pcc-cpufreq driver. Depending on the
Hello,
I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe performance drop
for systems using pcc-cpufreq driver. Depending on the number of CPUs
the system might be almost unusable. The OS jitter for 4.17.y and
4.18.-rcx
Hello,
I've recently noticed that commit 554c8aa8ecad ("sched: idle: Select
idle state before stopping the tick") causes severe performance drop
for systems using pcc-cpufreq driver. Depending on the number of CPUs
the system might be almost unusable. The OS jitter for 4.17.y and
4.18.-rcx
48 matches
Mail list logo
