On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 05:32:05PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> SPECJBB: Single JVMs (one per node, 4 nodes), THP is disabled
>
> 3.7.0 3.7.0 3.7.0
> 3.7.0 3.7.0 3.7.0
>
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 04:47:15PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On 11/24/12, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Warning: This is an insanely long mail and there a lot of data here. Get
> > coffee or something.
> >
> > This is another round of comparisons between the latest released versions
> > of each of
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 04:47:15PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
On 11/24/12, Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote:
Warning: This is an insanely long mail and there a lot of data here. Get
coffee or something.
This is another round of comparisons between the latest released versions
of
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 05:32:05PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
SPECJBB: Single JVMs (one per node, 4 nodes), THP is disabled
3.7.0 3.7.0 3.7.0
3.7.0 3.7.0 3.7.0
rc6-stats-v5r1
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 05:32:05PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> SPECJBB: Single JVMs (one per node, 4 nodes), THP is enabled
>
>
> SPECJBB: Single JVMs (one per node, 4 nodes), THP is disabled
Just to clarify, the "JVMs (one per node, 4 nodes)" was a cut
error. Single JVM meant that there was
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 05:32:05PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From here, we're onto the single JVM configuration. I suspect
> this is tested much more commonly but note that it behaves very
> differently to the multi JVM configuration as explained by Andrea
>
On 11/24/12, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Warning: This is an insanely long mail and there a lot of data here. Get
> coffee or something.
>
> This is another round of comparisons between the latest released versions
> of each of three automatic numa balancing trees that are out there.
>
> From the
On 11/24/12, Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote:
Warning: This is an insanely long mail and there a lot of data here. Get
coffee or something.
This is another round of comparisons between the latest released versions
of each of three automatic numa balancing trees that are out there.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 05:32:05PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
From here, we're onto the single JVM configuration. I suspect
this is tested much more commonly but note that it behaves very
differently to the multi JVM configuration as explained by Andrea
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 05:32:05PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
SNIP
SPECJBB: Single JVMs (one per node, 4 nodes), THP is enabled
SNIP
SPECJBB: Single JVMs (one per node, 4 nodes), THP is disabled
Just to clarify, the JVMs (one per node, 4 nodes) was a cutpaste
error. Single JVM meant that
10 matches
Mail list logo
