On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:30:00AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Grant Grundler wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
>>> I think that de2104x driver should be removed (or at least its
>>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE) and MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE with only 21040 and 21041
>>>
On Monday 25 February 2008 08:28:14 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Grant Grundler wrote:
> > ISTR there was a time when tulip would compete with de4x5 for devices.
> > tulip is the preferred driver. That's clearly no longer the case
> > and perhaps both distro's need to revisit this.
>
> The only reason why
On Monday 25 February 2008 08:28:14 Jeff Garzik wrote:
Grant Grundler wrote:
ISTR there was a time when tulip would compete with de4x5 for devices.
tulip is the preferred driver. That's clearly no longer the case
and perhaps both distro's need to revisit this.
The only reason why de4x5
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:30:00AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Grant Grundler wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
I think that de2104x driver should be removed (or at least its
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE) and MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE with only 21040 and 21041
PCI IDs added
Grant Grundler wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
I think that de2104x driver should be removed (or at least its
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE) and MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE with only 21040 and 21041 PCI
IDs added to de4x5.
I can send a patch if this is acceptable.
It's
Grant Grundler wrote:
ISTR there was a time when tulip would compete with de4x5 for devices.
tulip is the preferred driver. That's clearly no longer the case
and perhaps both distro's need to revisit this.
The only reason why de4x5 still exists is that the /tulip/ driver fails
to work on a
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2008 04:21:11 Grant Grundler wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:23:06PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > On Saturday 26 January 2008 21:58:10 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I was having problems with
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Monday 18 February 2008 04:21:11 Grant Grundler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:23:06PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008 21:58:10 Ondrej Zary wrote:
Hello,
I was having problems with these
Grant Grundler wrote:
ISTR there was a time when tulip would compete with de4x5 for devices.
tulip is the preferred driver. That's clearly no longer the case
and perhaps both distro's need to revisit this.
The only reason why de4x5 still exists is that the /tulip/ driver fails
to work on a
Grant Grundler wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
I think that de2104x driver should be removed (or at least its
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE) and MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE with only 21040 and 21041 PCI
IDs added to de4x5.
I can send a patch if this is acceptable.
It's
On Monday 18 February 2008 04:21:11 Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:23:06PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > On Saturday 26 January 2008 21:58:10 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I was having problems with these FreedomLine cards with Linux before
> > > but tested it
On Monday 18 February 2008 04:21:11 Grant Grundler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:23:06PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008 21:58:10 Ondrej Zary wrote:
Hello,
I was having problems with these FreedomLine cards with Linux before
but tested it thoroughly today.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:23:06PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Saturday 26 January 2008 21:58:10 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I was having problems with these FreedomLine cards with Linux before but
> > tested it thoroughly today. This card uses DEC 21041 chip and has TP and
> > BNC
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:23:06PM +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008 21:58:10 Ondrej Zary wrote:
Hello,
I was having problems with these FreedomLine cards with Linux before but
tested it thoroughly today. This card uses DEC 21041 chip and has TP and
BNC connectors:
On Saturday 26 January 2008 21:58:10 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> Hello,
> I was having problems with these FreedomLine cards with Linux before but
> tested it thoroughly today. This card uses DEC 21041 chip and has TP and
> BNC connectors:
>
> 00:12.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Digital Equipment
On Saturday 26 January 2008 21:58:10 Ondrej Zary wrote:
Hello,
I was having problems with these FreedomLine cards with Linux before but
tested it thoroughly today. This card uses DEC 21041 chip and has TP and
BNC connectors:
00:12.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Digital Equipment Corporation
Hello,
I was having problems with these FreedomLine cards with Linux before but
tested it thoroughly today. This card uses DEC 21041 chip and has TP and BNC
connectors:
00:12.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip
21041 [Tulip Pass 3] [1011:0014] (rev 21)
de2104x
Hello,
I was having problems with these FreedomLine cards with Linux before but
tested it thoroughly today. This card uses DEC 21041 chip and has TP and BNC
connectors:
00:12.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip
21041 [Tulip Pass 3] [1011:0014] (rev 21)
de2104x
18 matches
Mail list logo
