ray_cs was imported to the kernel as one of the first test drivers by
Linus. At the time, he wanted to get rid of the CardServices(function...)
interface and replace it with pcmcia_function calls. It seems that
the correct fix would be to change pcmcia_request_irq to RequestIRQ
like all the oth
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 11:12:57PM +0100, Rasmus Andersen wrote:
>
> Thanks for the pointer. However my test build still barfs in the final
> link phase because we (in t10p6) morphed drivers/pcmcia/cs.c::pcmcia_
> request_irq into (the static) cs_request_irq. The rename part
> broke the two other
Rasmus Andersen wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. However my test build still barfs in the final
> link phase because we (in t10p6) morphed drivers/pcmcia/cs.c::pcmcia_
> request_irq into (the static) cs_request_irq. The rename part
> broke the two other places in cs.c where pcmcia_request_irq was
> This patch, and a lot of others of a similar nature, are in my test10pre6
> compile patch at
[snip]
(Added a bit to the cc list)
Hi Arjan.
Thanks for the pointer. However my test build still barfs in the final
link phase because we (in t10p6) morphed drivers/pcmcia/cs.c::pcmcia_
request_irq
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The variable, osb4_revision, is inside a #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS block but
> I was not able to discern if the line where it is referred should be
> #ifdef'ed also. The following patch moves the variable declaration out-
> side the #ifdef block, as a blind
Forgot to cc linux-kernel
Hi.
I get the following error when trying to compile 2.4.0-test10pre6
without procfs support:
drivers/ide/osb4.c: In function `pci_init_osb4':
drivers/ide/osb4.c:264: `osb4_revision' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/ide/osb4.c:264: (Each undeclared iden
6 matches
Mail list logo
