Re: Correct commit mask for page data size

2019-05-24 Thread Jason Behmer
Yup, that makes sense, thanks for the response. On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:54 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 06:49:07 -0700 > Jason Behmer wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > I just noticed this email. I know it's a late response, but since you > Cc'd LKML, I figured I would respond anyway

Re: Correct commit mask for page data size

2019-05-23 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 06:49:07 -0700 Jason Behmer wrote: Hi Jason, I just noticed this email. I know it's a late response, but since you Cc'd LKML, I figured I would respond anyway, and at least have an answer in the archives ;-) > Hi Steven, > We're wondering what the correct number of bits to ta

Correct commit mask for page data size

2019-04-01 Thread Jason Behmer
Hi Steven, We're wondering what the correct number of bits to take from the commit field is when determining the size of the page data. The format file shows the bottom 56 bits not overlapping with anything: field: local_t commit; offset:8; size:8; signed:1; field: int over